Décisions finales |
Motifs |
|
Colvin and Jackson v. Hillcrest Variety, Gillies (plainte accueillie) |
sexe, avances sexuelles, harcèlement |
|
Henry v. Mrs Beasley’s Bake Shop Inc., Kuntz (plainte rejetée) |
croyance, race, couleur, harcèlement |
|
Howard v. de Ruiter (plainte rejetée) |
harcèlement, état matrimonial, état familial
|
|
Jeffrey v. Dofasco Inc. (plainte rejetée) |
handicap |
|
King v. Bura and the Estate of Matthew Bura by his Estate Trustee (plainte accueillie) |
race, couleur |
|
Tilberg v. McKenzie Forest Products Inc. (plainte rejetée) |
handicap |
Règlements |
Motifs |
|
Adore v. City of Toronto, Pritchard, Kolbe |
handicap |
|
Alexander v. Woodbine Entertainment Group, Green, Saito |
couleur, race |
|
Ali v. Axia Netmedia Corporation, Sanderson |
croyance, harcèlement |
|
Alinas v. Royal Trust Corp. |
âge, handicap |
|
Andrucko v. Environmental Services Inc., Davidson |
handicap, âge |
|
Briggs v. Sun Media (Toronto) Corporation, Sun Media Corporation |
sexe, représailles, handicap |
|
Brunetto v. Nella Cutlery (Toronto) Inc., Nella |
handicap |
|
Clancy v. Kleinburg Rotary Non-Profit Housing Corp. (now The Gables of Kleinburg) |
âge |
|
Cohen, Davies, Choy, Ting, Cheng, Kimber v. Cornerstone Properties Inc., Vanboxtel, St. Clair, Richmill Development Corp. |
âge |
|
Cook v. 633490 Ontario Inc. o/a Chatterson-Long Funeral Home, Southwell |
handicap |
|
Craig v. Tri-Ad Graphic Communications Ltd., Revesz, McCreary, McIlwham |
handicap, harcèlement |
|
Jane Doe v. A Police Service, Ms. F, Ms. G, Mr. H |
état matrimonial |
|
Edberg v. Ultramatic Sleep of Canada Inc., Patterson |
race |
|
Ehimika v. North Kingston Community Health Centre (Better Beginnings for Kingston Children), Webb, Beeler, Rosenbaum |
ascendance, origine ethnique, représailles, harcèlement |
|
Fearon v. Primtech Institute/Argosy Education Group, Fisher, Meadowcroft, Dr. Markovitz |
couleur, race, représailles |
|
Finkers v. Lason Canada Management Company, Crowell |
handicap |
|
Forbes v. 1210478 Ontario Inc. o/a Ottawa Marriott Hotel |
handicap, harcèlement |
|
François v. Rudan Holdings Ltd. o/a Sundowner Inn, Piche |
couleur, lieu d’origine, race, sexe |
|
Gregor v. 848347 Ontario Ltd., o/a Solid Gold Inn, Rudan |
état familial |
|
Hill v. Blimpie International Inc., Frid |
services |
|
Hutchings v. Roy Foss Motors, Foss, Pederson & Mraz |
sexe, harcèlement sexuel, avances sexuelles
|
|
Jopling v. Kember Store Metals, Kember |
handicap |
|
Kemp v. Szczepski & Piccinin |
handicap |
|
Kitchen v. Teleperformance Canada |
handicap |
|
Labine v. The Perfect Cut Property Maintenance and Landscaping Inc., Wilson, Wilson |
sexe |
|
Lakich v. Union Energy Limited Partnership |
sexe, harcèlement sexuel, représailles |
|
Lang v. Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Community and Social Services and Enfants en Péril (Children at Risk) |
ascendance, origine ethnique |
|
Liard v. Brims Enterprises Limited, Brims |
handicap |
|
Leung v. Combined Insurance Company of America, Iozzo, Petrini |
âge, ascendance, origine ethnique, race, sexe |
|
Mailloux v. MBT Insurance Brokers Limited, Bergeron |
handicap |
|
Manoll v. Pembroke Police Service, MacIssac |
casier judiciaire |
|
McBride v. Ray Michaels Health & Fitness Club, Slaney, Dennett |
sexe, harcèlement, avances sexuelles, représailles |
|
Neusch, Fox v. Ministry of Transportation, City of Hamilton, Disabled and Aged Regional Transportation System |
handicap |
|
Ranoute v. Royal Capital Stamping and Tooling Ltd. |
handicap |
|
Saxon v. The Corporation of the Town of Amherstburg |
handicap |
|
Searle v. The Partners’ Film Co. Ltd., Marin |
handicap |
|
Sinclair v. J.C. Trailers & Equipment Ltd. |
handicap |
|
Smith v. Roy Ross Motors Ltd., Devo, Bone, Rizzutto |
couleur, race |
|
Taylor (Russell) v. Dr. Neiman and Associates, Dr. Weingarten |
sexe, avances sexuelles |
|
Toronto Women’s Bathhouse Committee, Gillis, Jansen, Rowe, Gallant, Hamilton, Chan, Thames v. Toronto Police Services Board, Wilson, Greenaway, Petrie, Demkiw, Christie |
sexe, harcèlement sexuel, orientation sexuelle |
|
Waters v. Harrietha |
sexe |
|
Yu v. Morrison Hershfield Limited, Pappas |
race, origine ethnique, lieu d’origine, représailles
|
|
Zanatta v. Fourier Pharma Inc., Charron |
harcèlement, sexe, représailles |
Cour divisionnaire (Appel) |
Motifs |
|
Smith and OHRC v. Mardana Limited (c.o.b. as Mr. Lube), Keelestaff Ltd. (c.o.b. as Mr. Lube), Iswood Ltd. (c.o.b. as Mr. Lube), Strynadka, Neal (appel accueilli) |
race |
|
Ervine v. OHRC, Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Company of Canada, Eva (requête rejetée) |
handicap |
|
Dr. Hassaram v. OHRC, St. Michael’s Hospital, Dr. Sugar (requête rejetée) |
handicap |
|
Losenno v. OHRC, and Metroland Inc. (intervenor) (requête rejetée) |
handicap |
Cour supérieure de justice |
Motifs |
|
A v. B, and OHRC (interdiction provisoire de publication en vigueur) |
harcèlement sexuel |
|
Cour d’appel (y compris autorisation d’interjeter appel) |
Motifs |
|
Campbell v. OHRC (requête d’autorisation d’interjeter appel rejetée) |
race, ascendance, handicap, lieu d’origine |
|
Gurofsky v. OHRC, Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology, Middleton, Rozell, Rundle (requête d’autorisation d’interjeter appel rejetée) |
handicap |
|
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario v. McKinnon and OHRC (appel rejeté) |
race, ascendance, origine ethnique, harcèlement |
|
Layzell v. OHRC (requête d’autorisation d’interjeter appel rejetée) |
sexe, handicap, représailles |
|
O.N., A Minor, by this litigation guardian, N.N., A Minor, by this litigation guardian, and C.K. v. OHRC (requête d’autorisation d’interjeter appel retirée) |
handicap, association |
|
Tranchemontage v. Director of the Ontario Disability Support Program of the Ministry of Community, Family and Children’s Services v. Social Benefits Tribunal (la Commission était partie intervenante) |
handicap |
|
Syndicat Northcrest c. Amselem (la Commission était partie intervenante) |
croyance |
|
Eleanor Iness v. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation and Ontario Human Rights Commission (requête d’autorisation d’interjeter appel rejetée) |
état d’assisté social |
|
Pritchard c. Ontario (Commission des droits de la personne) (appel rejeté) |
sexe, harcèlement sexuel, représailles |
|
Québec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) c. Québec (Procureur général) (la Commission était partie intervenante) |
âge |
|
Renvoi relatif au mariage entre personnes du même sexe (la Commission était partie intervenante) |
orientation sexuelle |
|
Jeremy Seth Gurofsky v. Ontario Human Rights Commission, Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology, Charles Middleton, Gail Rozell, Howard Rundle (requête d’autorisation d’interjeter appel rejetée) |
handicap |