About the Commission

The Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC) was established as an arm’s length agency of government in 1961 to prevent discrimination and to promote and advance human rights in Ontario. The OHRC is one pillar of Ontario’s human rights system, alongside the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) and the Human Rights Legal Support Centre (HRLSC).

Ontario Human Rights Commission Strategic Plan 2023 – 2025

This Strategic Plan provides the framework for 2023 – 2025. It lays out our proactive areas of focus for the coming three years. It is geared toward achieving results and creating an environment that encourages and supports a commitment to human rights accountability in our community. This Strategic Plan allows for developing, each year, a focused list of valid, necessary and measurable actions that advance the OHRC towards results. Internally, it provides the basis for more detailed operational plans to make sure that all organizational activities connect to results.
 
We envision an inclusive society where everyone takes responsibility for promoting and protecting human rights; where everyone is valued and treated with equal dignity and respect; and where everyone’s human rights are a lived reality.

We believe that the way to realize this vision is to activate and engage the full range of our functions and powers under the Ontario Human Rights Code and our institutional expertise to dismantle the complex, intersecting dynamics and conditions that foster and perpetuate systemic discrimination.

Our mission is to promote and enforce human rights, to engage in relationships that embody the principles of dignity and respect, and to create a culture of human rights compliance and accountability. We act as a driver for social change based on principles of substantive equality. We accomplish our mission by exposing, challenging and ending entrenched and widespread structures and systems of discrimination through education, policy development, public inquiries and litigation.

Administrative: 

Our values

We commit to embodying the following in all of our work and ways of working:

  • Respectful, engaged, trusting and collaborative relationships: We will engage in respectful, trusting and collaborative relationships, and put the lived-experience of people at the centre of our work.
     
  • Transformative approaches: We will be courageous, persistent, creative and innovative in pursuing systemic change and real impact.
     
  • Integrity: We will be principled and independent in advancing and securing substantive equality.
     
  • Accountability: We will be transparent and accountable to the people of Ontario both in terms of the pursuit of our mandate and the use of our resources.

Meet our Commissioners

Commissioners have in-depth knowledge and expertise in human rights issues and issues relating to vulnerable populations, public policy, social values, and concepts of fairness, justice and public service. 

Chief Commissioner Patricia DeGuire

Patricia DeGuire is a Woman-of-colour who pushes boundaries to ensure access to justice, equality and equity. She has a passion for the rule of law, and a commitment to public service, mentoring, coaching and legal education.

A member of the Ontario bar since February 1993, she is a professional adjudicator/arbitrator/mediator/coach, and was a Deputy Judge with the Ontario Superior Court of Justice – SCC Division. For over 25 years, she has served on provincial and federal tribunals, including Vice-Chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, the Immigration Appeal Division/IRB, and the OLRB/Pay Equity Hearings Tribunal. She has also held senior leadership roles with JusticeNet, Legal Aid Ontario, the Ontario and Canadian Bar Associations, and the WLAO. Patricia was a member of the CABL, OBA, LSUC and WLAO mentorship programs and is an avid mentor and coach for many youths and adults in the legal and other professions. She is a constitutional law scholar; holds a Fellow of Chartered Insurance Professionals of Canada – Claims Major; and is co-author and co-editor of the first Canadian Insurance Dictionary.

Patricia served in leading roles with Black North Initiative and is a founder of the Canadian Association of Black Lawyers and the Black Law Student Association Canada. She also was a frequent lecturer at the Organization of Commonwealth Caribbean Bars Association International Law Forum, and with the Faculty of Society of Ontario Adjudicators and Regulators. She is the founder of the Forum for Education for At-Risk Youths, and speaks often to students at all levels of schools. Patricia’s many career honours include the BLSA-C 2021 Impact Award, Canadian Bar Association 2020 Touchstone Award, CBA Rare-Find in April 2012, and the OBA’s Distinguished Service Award in 2020. She also received Legal Aid Ontario’s 2007 GEM Award for outstanding public service for providing access to justice access for low-income individuals and communities, the 2006 Law Society of Upper Canada Lincoln Alexander Award, and the BLSAC named the cup for the Julius Alexander Diversity Moot in her honour – the Patricia DeGuire Diversity Moot Cup.

Appointment: August 19, 2021 – August 18, 2023; August 19, 2023 - August 18, 2026

Commissioner Jewel Amoah

Jewel Amoah is a Canadian-Trinidadian human rights lawyer, activist and academic. Jewel has facilitated organizational change in various domestic and international public sector entities by raising awareness of harassment, discrimination, human rights and equity in teaching, learning and working environments. These environments have provided an opportunity to apply and expand her academic analysis of intersectionality and its impact on attaining equitable outcomes based on race, gender, gender identity and disability identities, among others.

Jewel is committed to research, advocacy and activism to inspire and produce systemic change, enhance access to justice and the full enjoyment of rights. She is a graduate of McMaster University, the University of Ottawa and the University of Cape Town. She lectured for four years at the University of the West Indies in Trinidad and is currently the Human Rights & Equity Advisor with the Halton District School Board.

Appointment: May 28, 2020 – May 27, 2025

Commissioner Randall Arsenault

Randall Arsenault is a 19-year veteran of the Toronto Police Service. Randall has experience in Youth Services, the Community Response Unit, Street Crime Unit, Criminal Investigative Bureau, Primary Response and has worked with the Aboriginal Peacekeeping Unit for over 20 years. Randall was also the Service's first Community Engagement Officer. An early adapter of social networking, Randall uses his global reach to engage and educate. Randall speaks at numerous conferences and has facilitated workshops on cyber bullying, effective engagement strategies and modern day policing.

Randall has taken leadership roles in many grassroots initiatives, and local and national charities. He is the recipient of awards and recognition for community outreach and engagement, and is an advocate for mental health awareness. Randall is a licensed carpenter, and in his spare time enjoys the outdoors.

Re-appointment: January 9, 2023 – January 8, 2025

Commissioner Brian Eyolfson

Brian Eyolfson is a lawyer who practices alternative dispute resolution, providing independent investigation, mediation and adjudication services, primarily in the area of human rights.

He was a Commissioner with the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls, from September 2016 to June 2019. Before that, Brian served as Acting Deputy Director with the Legal Services Branch of Ontario’s Ministry of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation. From 2007 to 2016, he was a full-time Vice-Chair with the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, where he adjudicated and mediated many human rights applications. Brian was a Senior Staff Lawyer with Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto (ALS) where he practiced human rights, Aboriginal and administrative law. He also represented ALS at the Ipperwash Inquiry. Brian also previously served as Counsel to the OHRC.

Brian has a B.Sc. in psychology and an LL.B. from Queen’s University, and an LL.M., specializing in administrative law, from Osgoode Hall Law School. He was called to the Ontario Bar in 1994. Brian is a member of Couchiching First Nation in Treaty #3 territory.

Appointment: November 12, 2022 – November 11, 2025

Commissioner Violetta Igneski

Violetta Igneski is a professor in ethics and political philosophy at McMaster University. For more than 18 years, her teaching and research have been focused on human rights, global justice and collective responsibility. She is a published author in leading journals and has presented her work at international conferences. In addition to her academic contributions, she has demonstrated a commitment to promoting an environment of respect and inclusion in various professional and administrative capacities, currently serving as Chair of the McMaster Research Ethics Board and Equity Officer in her department. She was awarded her PhD from the University of Toronto.

Re-appointment: January 9, 2023 – January 8, 2025

Commissioner Gary Pieters

Gary Pieters is an educator and has served as a member (part-time) of the Minister of Education's Advisory Council on Special Education since 2017, and as a member (part-time) of the Toronto Islands Residential Trust Corporation since 2020. He is a principal with the Toronto District School Board, and is a commissioner and past president of the Urban Alliance on Race Relations. He attended the University of Toronto and earned his Bachelor of Arts (BA) in African Studies and Political Science as a member of New College; and his Bachelor of Education (BEd) and Master of Education (MEd) at Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of Toronto (OISE/UT).

Appointment: March 25, 2023 – March 24, 2026

Commissioner Sandi Bell

Sandi Bell identifies as a Black Indigenous woman with disabilities.  Her passion to rid society of and prevent racism, discrimination, and oppression is more than a topic or research project; it is a way of life.

Sandi’s work in disability rights has been extensive and in many different areas. In the late seventies and eighties, as a school Trustee in Hamilton, she spearheaded initiatives including advocacy flowing from Bill 82 to ensure that children with disabilities previously denied public education were welcome with needed supports. She was a member of the Mental Health & Law Advisory Committee of the Canadian Mental Health Commission. More recently, she was appointed Chair of the AODA Health Care Standards Development Committee, which was tasked to recommend accessibility standards to the Ontario Minister of Seniors and Accessibility and the Minister of Health to reduce and prevent barriers in health care in Ontario hospitals.  She also served for two terms as part-time Commissioner for the Canadian Human Rights Commission. In her roles as a rights educator, mediator, Commissioner, and a member of the Appeal Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board, she gained a more fulsome understanding of the access to justice barriers that many individuals who experience discrimination routinely face.

The entirety of Sandi’s professional and volunteer endeavours have, in one way or another, been in pursuit of equality, human rights, social justice and inclusion for diverse and marginalized communities. With well over 30 years of experience in the areas of human rights, anti-racism, anti-oppression, and equity, she has worked closely with many different equality-seeking communities. The totality of her experiences offers her great insight into the experiences and impacts of discrimination based on one, multiple and intersecting protected grounds, and also on the larger context and the systemic barriers and issues that contribute to ongoing systemic discrimination.

Appointment: March 23, 2023 – March 24, 2025

 

Administrative: 

Profile on Commissioner Violetta Igneski

Violetta Igneski: An ethical look at human rights


Are ethics and philosophy important to understanding human rights? For 18 years, Commissioner Violetta Igneski has focused on this very intersection. “If I say there is a human right to have our basic needs met, for example, it actually means that someone has a duty to do something about it so I can have my right fulfilled,” explains Igneski.

An associate professor of Philosophy at McMaster University, Igneski teaches and researches human rights, global justice and collective responsibility. She tries to bring nuance to these areas by exploring questions about who has a duty to do something to whom, if human rights are actually going to be substantive things. “I’m lucky enough to have a voice, teach students and share topics that they might not have thought about,” says Igneski. “To think about, for example, do we have obligations to aid other people? Why would I have to sacrifice my interests to help other people? What would that mean?”

Igneski was the first in her family to go to university, and earned her PhD in Philosophy from the University of Toronto. She finds the ability to have such discussions in the classroom enriching. She sees them as a way to advocate for social justice.  

“Fulfilling and respecting human rights depends on political and legal structures and institutions, but it’s also important to consider our personal decisions and this brings us into the sphere of ethics,” observes Igneski. Personal decisions, she elaborates, would include how we behave and act towards each other, how we treat other people, and how these actions take place within collective contexts.

“We need to think about human rights at the community, state and international levels, so we can coordinate our efforts and figure out how we can best implement those, and then divide up and allocate the tasks to each of us as individuals,” she says. “It is about asking what is required of me, as an individual in this collective context with other people.”

Igneski extends this idea to consider how research in ethics applies to her role at the OHRC, especially during a global pandemic. One of the things that has become evident during COVID-19 is an increase in people’s general awareness of inequalities in our society.

“These inequalities have been exacerbated by the pandemic,” says Igneski. “I think that there seems to be, with this awareness, some positive energy and so, some potential to change things. I see some new understanding of why there are social programs to help people in these situations, and also why they are inadequate.”

Through her role at the OHRC, Igneski hopes to build on this momentum. She wants us all to think about changemaking as we witness the pandemic’s disproportionate impact on people living in poverty, or living with disability, on racialized persons and Indigenous peoples.

Igneski also talks about how in 2020, the OHRC released its Policy statement on a human rights-based approach to managing the COVID-19 pandemic, published a series of FAQs on rights and obligations, and was vocal about collecting human-rights based data to know the real impacts of this pandemic. Each of these initiatives shows how the OHRC continually examines issues from an intersecting and ethical standpoint.

“Poverty requires a lot more attention, and addressing it is currently a strategic priority of the OHRC. We see so many issues and factors undermining people’s access to healthcare, and poverty happens to overlap with many of these,” observes Igneski. “We have some understanding about the intersecting grounds, but working on communicating them in an effective manner and educating the public is one of the most important roles I see the OHRC playing.”

Igneski brings her applied theoretical knowledge to the OHRC with the hope of working with people on the ground and in the community. In addition to her academic contributions, she has shown her commitment to promoting an environment of respect and inclusion in various professional and administrative capacities, currently serving as Chair of the McMaster Research Ethics Board and Equity Officer in her department. She has authored several research papers on the duty to aid, ethical living and political philosophy. So she continues to live the intersection between ethics and human rights, to the benefit of all Ontarians.

Profile on Commissioner Jewel Amoah

Jewel Amoah: An obligation to take responsibility


“We all exist relative to something else. I think that’s really where we get our identity – who I am relative to each of you in age, race and culture?” says Commissioner Jewel Amoah, a Canadian-Trinidadian human rights lawyer, activist and academic. Amoah believes that we are hard-wired to function around comparisons, and discrimination happens when we structure those comparisons to disadvantage others.

Amoah is currently the Assistant Dean, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion at the John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design, University of Toronto. She has also worked with organizations both in Canada and abroad, providing extensive advice on gender equality and legislative reform.

While studying Literature and Political Science, and then going to law school, Amoah  was inspired by the events unfolding at that time – the Oka Crisis (Kanesatake Resistance), Nelson Mandela’s release from prison and the Gulf War – which all exposed human rights challenges around the world. “In the geopolitical context that we live in, we are grossly advantaged by the disadvantages that many other people experience. And I think that fascinated me personally, and perhaps also inspired me in a professional sense,” adds Amoah. “I was intrigued by the politics of the world, and really fascinated by notions of identity, geography, rights, access to justice, and what all of that means.”

Amoah is a graduate of McMaster University, the University of Ottawa and the University of Cape Town, and lectured for four years at the University of the West Indies in Trinidad. Identity and equality issues are at the core of her research interests. In her doctoral dissertation, Amoah examined the impact of intersecting identities on attaining equality. She developed GRACE, an analytical tool to show how the intersection of gender, race, age and culture affect access to equality rights for girls subject to traditional or customary law as well as modern day civil law in South Africa. Her research pointed her to some socio-economic situations/cases in rural South Africa, where gender, race, age and culture could place an individual at a severe disadvantage since she views these like axes equality operates around.

“Think about GRACE as somebody’s name,” explains Amoah. “If you change any part of your name, it doesn’t mean the same thing. So just as if you remove any aspect of your identity, your outcome doesn’t remain the same. Why is it that a tweak in identity is going to change your outcomes, when if we are really committed to equality, we should all be entitled to the same outcome? Gender, race, age and culture are not really interchangeable – they're immutable, because they all combine to identify who we are and what we get access to in the moment.”

In her role as an OHRC Commissioner, Amoah brings her own experience as a racialized immigrant woman. She believes that issues of race, gender, identity and experiences need to be examined against the current context of post-colonialism, economics and natural environment. For example, she asks: “Why is the economic emphasis centered around North America and Europe, although the majority of people do not live there?”

She adds, “I stand in awe with these power differentials in the world – how they came to be and how they are sustained.” Even in her current role as an equity advisor, she sees how education is itself a factor of colonial structures and by extension, has created room for more inequities.

Amoah views the OHRC as a leader in the community and public arenas, and its policy role is about adapting systems to the reality and needs of individual identities, as well as collective community identities. “There’s a lot of inadvertent exclusion, because people say this is just the way we've always done things,” says Amoah. “And maybe you have always done things in a way that has always disadvantaged others, but now that we are aware of that continued disadvantage, we have an obligation to take responsibility for it.”

Amoah explains how the OHRC looks at ordinary events like policing, housing access, health care, or the right to read or play lacrosse, and identifies areas where things can be problematic: “I think the OHRC’s role is to raise awareness that equality is everywhere, but that means so is inequality. The OHRC’s job is to peel away that facade of niceness that we all like to hide behind... and help understand how we are being conscious and active in identifying and addressing inequality.”

Amoah feels that the background people come from is always important. “But more important is what you do to leverage or interpret those experiences in your background,” says Amoah. “Even if those backgrounds are ones of pure privilege and entitlement, that also has a lot of influence on how you view yourself and your role in the world. So yes, I think where we come from is largely influential in terms of who we become, but not necessarily determinative. At some point we do have to take responsibility for that.”

Profile on Commissioner Randall Arsenault

Randall Arsenault: Using social media to break stereotypes, challenge the status quo


At first, Randall Arsenault may seem an unusual guy to be pegged for the title of a famous social media influencer. Having spent close to two decades as a police officer,  Arsenault sees his social media outreach as a way to engage with the community and humanize the badge. “How I am online is exactly how I am as a person. If I don’t educate, I at least hope to entertain,” says Arsenault, who is famous for the way he spreads information about preventing crime. Arsenault’s work on addressing bullying in schools, homelessness and mental health are also important assets that he brings to his role as an OHRC Commissioner.

“I come from a policing family – my father was a police officer in Toronto,” says Arsenault. “But growing up, I never actually wanted to become a police officer. The reason for that is, I never really liked police culture.” What Arsenault didn’t like, as a child, were the collateral issues that could affect police officers – such as potential burnout, substance abuse, domestic violence and suicide.

Arsenault admits he was a rebel growing up and got into trouble with the police himself as a youth. He moved to British Columbia to stay with his grandmother and complete high school. “After high school, I was kind of lost,” recalls Arsenault. “I was on social assistance at two different times. I remember my friend and I would go to a McDonalds or Burger King drive-thru at closing time. I knew people who were paying at the drive thru would often drop change. We’d go and look for spare change, just as a way to get money and buy bread because we were hungry. I was rebellious.” Eventually he got an apprenticeship in construction, and that helped him get back on his feet and “stay out of trouble.”

When Arsenault moved back to Ontario, to explore opportunities during the construction boom, his father was working with the Aboriginal Peacekeeping Unit. He is proud of his Indigenous roots from his father’s side of the family, which he discovered only after his father started doing work with the Aboriginal Peacekeeping Unit.

“That was the first time I really saw my dad in a different role, where he was very proactive and giving back to the community,” says Arsenault. The community engagement side to policing intrigued him and that pushed him to apply for the police service.

“I love my job as a police officer,” says Arsenault. Reflecting on how policing has changed since his father was an officer, Arsenault notes, “We’re constantly evolving, which is a good thing. This needs to happen for the public and it needs to happen for us.”

Arsenault has experience in Youth Services, the Community Response Unit, Street Crime Unit, Criminal Investigative Bureau, Primary Response and has worked with the Aboriginal Peacekeeping Unit. He was also the Service's first Community Engagement Officer.

Arsenault attributes his growing social media presence to the fact that he remains authentic and “does not put on a façade.” “I don’t take things too seriously, I get involved with the community and I challenge the status quo, even within the police service. Sometimes that doesn’t always go over very well, but it is what it is, and I’m okay with that.”

In between sharing jokes and funny videos on social media, Arsenault also uses crucial data such as crime statistics in neighbourhoods and stories about school safety to highlight important information.

In his role as a human rights commissioner, Arsenault has been vocal about the cascading effects that mental health has on people living with homelessness and addictions. "Someone asked me a while ago, what do you want to work on as a human rights commissioner? And they all kind of fall into one category. If I say mental health, I mean homelessness and I mean drug use. Because you know, they all affect the other," says Arsenault.

He adds, “It’s important for me to bring to the Commission a voice perhaps that’s not expected from an officer.” He has been subject to public scrutiny ever since he took on the role at the OHRC – which he welcomes as he continues to break stereotypes and challenge the status quo.

“I’ve been exposed to police culture and been around cops, my entire life. I’ve seen a good way of doing things and a bad way of doing things,” says Arsenault. He has built his credibility, both online and on the ground, by doing things the good and authentic way – by fostering community relationships or networks, by spreading information about crime prevention, and by adding a novel approach to both policing and human rights.

Administrative: 

Profile on Commissioner Gary Pieters

Gary Pieters: From Complainant to Commissioner - Amplifying a human rights ‘system’ mindset in how we think, act and treat each other


Gary Pieters, an educator, brings his own lived and professional experience as a Black Canadian that has driven him to dismantle systemic inequity. “My twin sibling and I were raised in a single-grandparent home having very limited social resources,” says Pieters. “Students come to school with lived experiences of poverty, and poverty can impact on access to resources. So when you look at barriers and poverty, it leads you to look at systems with a poverty-reduction lens.”

Before becoming an educator, Pieters held a variety of public and private sector jobs and volunteer experiences. He brings this history to the OHRC, along with skill sets cultivated from over two decades of leadership roles in equity initiatives in the education sector as teacher, vice-principal and principal.

Pieters first experienced Ontario’s human rights system as a complainant, when he felt the need to call out racism and vindicate his own rights. From being a complainant to becoming a Commissioner, Pieters talks about the importance of embedding human rights into all areas of life, especially education. He experienced long standing anti-Black racism in the public school system in Toronto as a student in the 1980s that continued into his career as educator.  “When students come into the classroom, it's not just the students. It's the parents, and it's the whole community that comes into school. That school is at the heart of the community,” he says.

Pieters strongly believes that education should provide equitable access to opportunity. He explains, “When students come to school, the school can either teach for belonging and citizenship, or it can marginalize students. So my whole philosophy around education is teaching from an inclusive lens, and that means dismantling any individual and systemic barriers that hinder students and communities.”

Another issue he brings up is language. English is not the first language for many people in diverse metropolitan cities. “There’s auditory discrimination, where people are discriminated against based on their tone or accent,” says Pieters. In situations where language can be a barrier, we need to rethink what and how we teach children, young people and adults in order to empower them with an amplified lens “to be self-advocates, who advocate for themselves and their needs. A basic fundamental of human rights and social justice is self-advocacy.”

Pieters believes that the human rights landscape we exist in is complex and ever-evolving. “There is a significant rise in racism, racial profiling, Islamophobia, homophobia and anti-Asian racism,” says Pieters. “Whether it is in schools or communities, people need to be able to add language to their own experiences.” He also oversaw a program on teaching young people how to identify, understand, address and prevent gender-based violence, sexism and exclusion.

Every year during Pride month, the issue of raising the flag within some denominational schools and district school boards has come up for debate. This has re-traumatized LGBTQ2S+ students, families and communities. “Raising the flag is extremely important because it affirms the need for inclusion – that everyone belongs, everyone’s rights are centred in our Human Rights Code,” says Pieters.

“I want to be a consequential Commissioner in the sense that I want to leave a lasting positive impact on the human rights landscape of Ontario,” says Pieters. He is an action-oriented leader who understands the challenges of living with and facing discrimination, and defending his rights to be free from it. “I will bring to life that type of passion and that type of energy, to invigorate the whole concept of a society where everyone can succeed and prosper, with respect for their fundamental human rights, to flourish and thrive,” says Pieters.

Pieters is also keen to tap into new areas where human rights needs to be explored. Examples are young people and access to justice, and the acceleration of technology, artificial intelligence and privacy.

“Incarceration rates are a big issue, and young people (especially Indigenous, Black and racialized) with limited resources are incarcerated at a higher rate,” says Pieters. He also notes the school-to-prison pipeline is an issue that needs to be looked at. He adds, “Racialized youth are disproportionately suspended from schools. When you are pushing children out of school, it denies them access to education and it puts them into harm’s way, and harm’s way is an open-ended concept.”

Considering COVID-19, Pieters observes how people are increasingly learning, working, shopping and banking from home. “Access to the Internet and connectivity and devices has become a human rights issue, especially for people who are poor, and cannot afford the cost of Internet, the cost of a device, the monthly connectivity rates whether it's for their phone bill or the data.”

Pieters spends his leisure time looking at and photographing Toronto’s skylines, walking or cycling by the water. He volunteers for community projects and provides his expertise for things that matter. “My goal is to help people develop a human rights mindset. It is embedded into the way we think, act and treat each other.”

Pieters has a social media presence and likes to tweet items that interest him on his Twitter account.

Profile on Commissioner Brian Eyolfson

Brian Eyolfson: We need to meaningfully listen to the lived experiences of Indigenous peoples


Five years ago, Brian Eyolfson was appointed as a Commissioner with the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls. “My job, through this National Inquiry, was to carry out a very large mandate in a way that put family members and survivors of violence first, and in a way that was trauma-informed, decolonizing and inclusive,” says Eyolfson, a Two-Spirit member of Couchiching First Nation in Treaty #3 territory. 

“It was a privilege to be involved in the process and to witness the courage, the strength and the resilience of so many family members and survivors who shared their truths with the National Inquiry, and many who shared publicly with everyone in Canada at public hearings.” Listening to the stories and lived experiences of the survivors has had a profound impact on Eyolfson. It reinforced his understanding of the many systemic practices that continue to affect the lives of Indigenous people, and create vulnerability for Indigenous women, girls, 2SLGBTQQIA people.

“There are things that can be done to change this,” says Eyolfson. “Education and awareness are important. We also need political will and for everybody in society to take action.”

This Inquiry’s 2019 final report identified overarching findings including colonial violence, human rights abuses, racism and most notably, genocide. “We also found that an absolute paradigm shift is required to dismantle colonialism within Canadian society, and from all levels of government and public institutions. Ideologies and instruments of colonialism, racism and misogyny, past and present, must be rejected,” says Eyolfson.

Eyolfson grew up in Fort Frances in northwestern Ontario. He pursued an undergraduate degree in psychology and volunteered with organizations addressing mental health issues. Around the same time, equality rights provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms came into effect. Also, the provisions of the Indian Act that took Indian status away from women who married non-status men, were amended. Eyolfson started to reflect more on the impacts of colonialism on his community.

“I saw community disconnect for a lot of people, due to direct sex discrimination and intergenerational sex discrimination. I also thought a lot about the impact that residential schools had on Indigenous families and communities, as my maternal grandparents had attended residential school,” says Eyolfson.

His interest in human rights and Indigenous rights influenced him to become a lawyer, and he now brings over two decades of legal experience to the Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC). He practices alternative dispute resolution and provides independent investigation, mediation and adjudication services, primarily in the area of human rights.  

Eyolfson sees public inquiries as an effective way to gather evidence, address issues and create positive change. From his own experiences as a Commissioner on the National Inquiry and his extensive background in Indigenous reconciliation, Eyolfson believes that people with lived experience have the true expertise and need to be meaningfully heard.

“Public inquiries can be educational, can create awareness and shed light on important issues,” says Eyolfson. “For the OHRC, public inquiries can be an effective means to gather the necessary evidence and information that is needed to create recommendations for positive change in the area of human rights, such as improving policies and practices to prevent and eliminate discrimination and create equitable opportunities or resolve situations of conflict.”  

Eyolfson also has considerable knowledge of issues affecting different communities across Ontario, particularly Indigenous peoples and communities. As the co-chair of the OHRC’s Indigenous Reconciliation Advisory Group, he has been actively working with Indigenous peoples and communities to advance reconciliation and substantive equality.

“I think it’s really important to have Indigenous peoples guide or lead the conversation on reconciliation,” says Eyolfson. “I think the Commission needs to listen to build relationships… it needs to meaningfully listen to the lived experience of Indigenous peoples and what they think would be solutions. I think it’s about centring the voices of Indigenous peoples and working along with them in a respectful way.”

Before serving as a Commissioner with the National Inquiry, Eyolfson was the Acting Deputy Director with the Legal Services Branch of Ontario’s Ministry of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation. From 2007 to 2016, he was a full-time Vice-Chair with the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, where he adjudicated and mediated many human rights applications. Eyolfson was also a senior staff lawyer with Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto (ALS), where he practiced human rights, Aboriginal and administrative law. He represented ALS at the Ipperwash Inquiry, and before that was counsel with the OHRC.

Throughout his career, Brian Eyolfson has focused on embedding lived experience in human rights work. This focus, and his own unique lived experiences, are invaluable assets to his guidance as an OHRC Commissioner.

OHRC Organization Chart - Linear format

November 2014

Chief Commissioner

  • Executive Advisor (reports to Executive Director)
  • Commission and Secretariat Coordinator (Designated Bilingual) (reports to Executive Advisor)

Executive Director

  • Executive Assistant Vacant
  • Administrative Assistant

Chief Administrative Officer – Centralized Services Branch

  • Junior Financial Analyst 
  • Information Technology Team Lead
  • Coordinator of Administrative Services
  • Technology Support Analyst
  • Administrative Clerk (2 positions)
  • Web Administration Developer
  • Network specialist
  • Network Architect, Web Lead 

Manager - Communications & Issues Management

  • Senior Communications Officer
  • Media Relations Officer (Designated Bilingual)
  • Information Officer (2 positions, 1 Designated Bilingual)
  • Special Events Coordinator
  • Analyst Issues Coordinator
  • Correspondence Coordinator

Director Policy, Education, Monitoring & Outreach

  • Administrative Assistant
  • Senior Policy Analysts (5 positions, 1 Designated Bilingual)
  • Human Rights Education and Change Specialist ( 2 positions, 1 Designated Bilingual)
  • Public Education and Outreach Officer (3)
  • Electronic Education Specialist

Manager – Legal Services and Inquiries (Designated Bilingual)

  • Counsel (6 positions, 1 Designated Bilingual)
  • Legal Secretary
  • Inquiry Analyst (3 positions, 1 Designated Bilingual)
  • Articling Student
Administrative: 

Public education

Developing a culture of human rights

Promoting human rights is key to developing a culture where everyone can play a part as we move to achieving the vision of society described in the Preamble to the Human Rights Code. This vision is consistent with that described in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, part of Canada's Constitution. It is a vision where everyone feels that they are an important part of the community and that they are able to participate fully to its development and well-being while respecting and taking responsibility for the rights of others.

Promotion & Partnership

The Commission engages in a wide range of educational activities and partnership initiatives, such as public awareness campaigns, presentations, workshops and conferences. It also engages in national and international cooperation, participates in intergovernmental task forces and receives delegations from around the world.

In keeping with its responsibility to promote understanding and awareness of and compliance with the Code, the Commission has an important mandate to conduct public education throughout the province. Public education is delivered primarily through the Commission's Web site, publications, public awareness campaigns, speaking engagements and presence at community events.

In addition, the Commission has also adopted an e-learning strategy as part of its overall public education program. We will be posting Code-related computer-based tools on this site in the near future.

In evaluating requests for speakers, the Commission focuses its resources on events and initiatives that are consistent with its strategic priorities and have the potential to: promote systemic prevention of Code violations and advancement of human rights; significantly enhance the Commission's relationship with strategic or underserved sectors; "train trainers" to have a sustainable "multiplier" effect in the organization; and reduce discrimination across a sector and/or to decrease the incidence of formal human rights complaints.

The Commission does not have the capacity to accept all requests. In such instances, the Commission tries to work with the organization or individual to help meet their needs in other ways through Commission resources or referral to other organizations.

This Web site provides the public with access to a wide array of information and educational resources including: an overview of the Human Rights Code and the Commission's mission; description of the complaint process; policies, plain language guides, public inquiry reports and Commission submissions; public education resources as well as news releases. The Commission's Web site is an increasingly important tool in the promotion of human rights in Ontario and ensures it is compatible with international accessibility standards for persons with disabilities and that documents are posted in both English and French in accordance with Ontario's French Language Services Act.

Speakers

Based on its current strategic priorities, the Commission provides educational sessions to employers, unions, professional associations, community organizations and other groups who are partners with us in striving to develop a culture of human rights.

To invite someone from the Commission to speak to your group, see the section on Requesting Public Education from the Commission.

International liaison

The Commission meets with delegations, intergovernmental organizations and staff from human rights commissions around the world to exchange ideas with them about administrative procedures and to share our common experiences in teaching people about human rights and enforcing human rights laws in civil society.

To inquire about the possibility of meeting with the Commission for this purpose, please contact us at:

Policy, Education, Monitoring and Outreach Branch (PEMO)
Ontario Human Rights Commission
180 Dundas Street West, 9th Floor
Toronto, ON M7A 2R9
Attention: Director

 

Litigation and inquiry strategy

The Ontario Human Rights Commission works to promote, protect and advance human rights in Ontario.  The Human Rights Code provides a range of different tools that the OHRC may use, including, among others, policy development, research, public education and training, human rights inquiries and legal action.

The OHRC has unique legal powers under the Human Rights Code.  We may conduct inquiries, make an application (a complaint) directly to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario to allege discrimination and seek a Tribunal order, or intervene in applications before the Tribunal. The OHRC may also take part in cases before other administrative tribunals and courts.  (For our powers under the Code, see here: https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90h19#BK33).

This Litigation and Inquiry Strategy sets out when and how the OHRC decides to conduct an inquiry or take an application to the Human Rights Tribunal or when to intervene in a legal proceeding. 

What is an Inquiry?

The Code says the OHRC can conduct an inquiry to:

  • Look into incidents of or conditions of tension or conflict in a community, institution or sector of the economy and to make recommendations, and encourage and co-ordinate plans, programs and activities, to reduce or prevent such incidents or sources of tension or conflict.
  • Look into programs, policy and practices made under statute for consistency with the Code and make recommendations.

Inquiries can be large or small, simple or complex.  They could include:

  • Private letters to an organization asking about an issue and requesting a response or more information
  • Public meetings
  • Online-questionnaires or feedback forms
  • Fact-finding, investigation, and requesting and obtaining information

What are Commission-initiated Applications?

The OHRC may make its own applications directly to the Tribunal to allege discrimination and ask for a Tribunal order, or intervene in other applications before the Tribunal.  Section 35 of the Code says the OHRC may intervene as a full party to an application at the Tribunal if the applicant gives their permission.  The OHRC can then participate in all stages of the proceeding, including calling evidence, cross-examining witnesses, presenting written and oral submissions and any negotiations or mediation. 

How do we choose which cases to be involved with?

Every year the Commission sets high level goals and priority issues to meet our statutory mandate.  However, human rights cases and issues for inquiry often emerge that are clearly important but may not fall within our current priority areas.

We look at new issues on a case-by-case basis to decide if any response is needed or whether an inquiry, intervention or Commission-initiated application at the Human Rights Tribunal is called for. We consider:

  • Would this support our statutory mandate, high-level strategic goals and priority areas of work?
    • Would it complement current, future or potential activities of the Commission?
  • Will it have a broad, systemic impact?
    • Does it raise significant  issues of public policy or public interest from a human rights perspective?
    • Will it benefit vulnerable or marginalized people protected by the Code?
    • What is the likely outcome?
  • Will it shape, clarify or advance human rights law in Ontario?
  • Is it an issue of such importance that Commission involvement is required because of:
    • The seriousness or importance of the matter?
    • The complexity of issue?
  • Could it be done within current OHRC resources?

How do we spot emerging issues?

Our Issues Management team monitors developments in human rights and related social issues, proposed provincial legislation, noteworthy Tribunal and court decisions, and other factors that could affect human rights in Ontario. We identify potential matters for litigation or inquiry through:

  • Issues raised in news media and other electronic publications
  • Cases scheduled to be heard by courts or tribunals as well as court and tribunal decisions
  • Notices from the Tribunal of applications that may raise significant human rights issues through, for example, interim decisions identifying opportunities for potential Commission intervention
  • Requests for Commission initiated-applications, inquiries or interventions from the public. To make a request contact info@ohrc.on.ca
  • Issues identified by staff and Commissioners 
  • Information from the Canadian Association of Statutory Human Rights Agencies about potential inquiries and legal proceedings
  • Opportunities from the Human Rights Legal Support Centre (which provides free legal advice to individuals who think they may have a discrimination claim)
  • Stakeholders or other partners also identify opportunities 

Some examples of OHRC Inquiries and Litigation

  • The Commission intervened as a full party in JT. v. Hockey Canada, an HRTO application about locker room access for trans amateur hockey players.  The Commission and applicant negotiated a settlement requiring Hockey Canada to allow all players in Ontario to access locker rooms in accordance with their gender identity, review and revise its procedures to protect privacy about players’ trans status, and provide training to all Ontario coaches as trainers about gender identity and related discrimination and harassment.
  • Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61 (CanLII) at the Supreme Court of Canada, involved a student with severe dyslexia whose specialized learning program was cut by the school district because of budgetary constraints.  The OHRC argued that the selection of a comparator group was not required and the service at issue was general education, not special education.  Both arguments were adopted by the Supreme Court, which ultimately held that the school district’s action amounted to discrimination.   
  • Peel Law Association v. Pieters, 2013 ONCA 396 (CanLII) at the Court of Appeal for Ontario,  involved two Black lawyers who were singled out and approached in an aggressive manner by a librarian in the Peel Law Association lounge.  The OHRC’s argument about the three-part test for a prima facie case of discrimination was confirmed by the Court of Appeal, which rejected the stricter test of discrimination applied by the Divisional Court.  The decision also made clear that racial profiling is a form of everyday racism.
  • We intervened in Claybourn v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 1298 (CanLII) to further access to justice.  The Tribunal considered the interpretation and application of section 45.1 of the Code in the context of previously filed public complaints under the Police Services Act (“PSA”) to the Office of the Independent Police Review Director about the conduct of police officers.  The Tribunal accepted the OHRC argument that the reasonable expectations of the parties had to be considered. It exercised its discretion not to dismiss the Tribunal applications under section 45.1 and confirmed that discipline under the PSA and relief to victims of discrimination under the Code can both be pursued. 
  • Jahn v. Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services, at the Tribunal, dealt with mental health and the corrections system. We addressed the systemic issues that Ms. Jahn raised in relation to appropriate mental health services and the placement of people with mental illness in segregation. The settlement between the OHRC, Ministry and Ms. Jahn will help to ensure the proper identification and care of women with mental illness in provincial correctional institutions.
    • In August of 2013, the Commission intervened in TB, MSB, and JBS v. Halton District School Board and Halton Student Transportation Services at the Tribunal.  Following settlement negotiations with the applicants and the OHRC, the school board and transportation service agreed to move the children’s bus stop closer to the family home, seek the Commission’s involvement in preparing and delivering training on human rights accommodation and inclusivity, amend their transportation policies to accommodate parents with Code-related needs, and recommend similar policy amendments to the Halton Catholic District School Board.
  • We held an inquiry into a rental housing licensing bylaw in the City of Waterloo in 2012, which imposed, among other things, per-person floor area requirements, gross floor area requirements, and minimum separation distances on certain rental units with three or more occupants.  As a result of the inquiry and subsequent negotiations, the City made a number of changes including requiring that the impact on tenants be considered before it revokes or suspends a licence, committing to monitoring the impact of the bylaw on Code-protected groups with the assistance of an expert, and making changes that make it easier for people to share bedrooms.    
  • In January 2014, the OHRC participated in an inquest into the deaths of three individuals with mental health disabilities, and issued a report in February of 2014 to help raise public awareness about how police use of force uniquely affects people with mental health disabilities. 
  • OHRC litigation has led to partnerships to create and sustain human rights organizational change with the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services. 
Resource Type: 

Our commitment to service

 

We, the staff of the Ontario Human Rights Commission, in full compliance with the spirit, intent and provisions of the Ontario Human Rights Code, are committed to providing the highest quality customer service.

This statement of our commitment reflects our best efforts to provide excellent customer service, within the limits of our resources, by:

  • being sensitive, aware and knowledgeable about the realities of prejudice and discrimination
  • recognizing and accommodating the diverse needs of our many client groups
  • providing accessible services, information and materials
  • acting on issues brought to the Commission as quickly as possible while maintaining the high quality of our work
  • responding to questions, concerns and criticism in a prompt, fair and respectful way.

Providing goods and services to people with disabilities

1. Our mission:

The mission of the Ontario Human Rights Commission (the “OHRC”) is to provide leadership for the promotion, protection and advancement of human rights in Ontario. The OHRC’s vision is an Ontario in which everyone is valued, treated with dignity and respect, and where human rights are nurtured by everyone.
 
The OHRC supports the full inclusion of persons with disabilities as set out in the United Nations’ Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Ontario Human Rights Code, the OHRC’s Policy and Guidelines on Disability and the Duty to Accommodate, the Ontarians with Disabilities Act (ODA) 2001 and the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) 2005. The OHRC is committed to complying with the AODA Accessibility Standards for Customer Service and providing high quality service where all persons have equal access to its services.
 

2. Our commitment to service:

In fulfilling our mission, the OHRC works at all times to provide our goods and services in a way that respects the dignity and independence of people with disabilities. Commissioners and staff are committed to giving people with disabilities equal opportunity to access our goods and services and to allowing them to equally benefit from the same services, in the same place and in a similar way as other customers. 
 
Our ongoing Commitment to Service is: 
We, the staff of the Ontario Human Rights Commission, in full compliance with the spirit, intent and provisions of the Ontario Human Rights Code, are committed to providing the highest quality customer service.
 
This statement of our commitment reflects our best efforts to provide excellent customer service, within the limits of our resources, by:
  1. being sensitive, aware and knowledgeable about the realities of prejudice and discrimination; 
  2. recognizing and accommodating the diverse needs of our many client groups; 
  3. providing accessible services, information and materials; 
  4. acting on issues brought to the OHRC as quickly as possible while maintaining the high quality of our work; and
  5. responding to questions, concerns and criticism in a prompt, fair and respectful way.
  6.  

3. Providing goods and services to people with disabilities:

The OHRC is committed to excellence in serving all customers, including those with disabilities, and will carry out our functions and responsibilities in an accessible manner. Each request for accommodation is assessed on a case-by-case basis. In addition we follow these steps:
 

3.1 Communication:

We communicate with people with disabilities in ways that take their specific needs into account. We train staff how to interact and communicate with people with various types of disabilities.
 
We train staff to communicate with customers over the telephone in clear and plain language and to speak clearly and slowly. If communication over the telephone is not suitable or available, the OHRC will offer to communicate with customers in other ways including email, TTY and relay services.
 
The OHRC will arrange and pay for sign language interpretation, captioning or other disability-related communication services for its meetings and public events, in advance or upon request depending on the audience. (Any requests should be made as early as possible due to the high demand for these types of services across the province.)
 

3.2 Assistive devices:

The OHRC ensures that our staff are trained and familiar with various assistive devices that may be used by customers while accessing our goods or services. 
 
The OHRC only uses facilities for meetings and public events that are accessible for people with disabilities who use mobility aids and devices or have other facility-related needs.
 
Customers are encouraged to contact the OHRC (or staff or manager involved) as early as possible if any special arrangements are required.
 

3.3 Accessible documents:

All of the OHRC’s public documents, including correspondence and publications, are available in electronic format. OHRC publications are released simultaneously in electronic format and made available on our website www.ohrc.on.ca which meets W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. 
 
All documents created by the OHRC are available, upon request, in other alternate formats, such as Braille, to accommodate disability-related needs. The OHRC will tell the individual when the document will be available in the requested format.
 

3.4 Scent sensitive office:

Due to health concerns related to exposure to scented products, such as perfumes and colognes, staff and visitors are asked to be considerate in their use of such products when visiting the OHRC office; they should be aware they may be asked to not use such products should this be required to accommodate individuals with environmental sensitivities.
 

4. Use of service animals and support persons:

We welcome people with disabilities who are accompanied by a service animal or a support person. We will ensure that staff are properly trained on how to interact with people with disabilities who are accompanied by a service animal or a support person.
 

5. Notice of temporary disruption:

The OHRC will inform customers if there is a planned or unexpected disruption in the facilities or services usually used by persons with disabilities. This notice will include information about the reason for the disruption, how long it may last, and what other facilities or services are available.
 
This information will be placed on our automated phone system and at the entrance to our offices on the 8th and 9th Floors at 180 Dundas Street West, Toronto. If visitors are expected we will do our best to let them know about any disruption including waiting outside the offices for those visitors to help them as needed.
 

6. Training for staff:

The OHRC provides training for all Commissioners and staff so that they understand this policy, the Accessibility Standards for Customer Service, how to interact and communicate with people with disabilities and how to respond to requests for accessibility and accommodation.
 
The OHRC will maintain and update an online training package for all current and future staff.
 

7. Feedback process:

The OHRC strives to meet and surpass customer expectations while serving customers with disabilities. Comments on our services regarding how well those expectations are being met are appreciated. 
 
Feedback may be made in writing, by telephone, TTY or email to the:
Ontario Human Rights Commission
Executive Director’s Office
180 Dundas Street West, Suite 900
Toronto, ON
M7A 2R9
 
Tel: 437-488-5278
Fax: 416-314-4985
Toll Free: 1-800-387-9080
TTY Local: 416-326-0603
TTY Toll Free: 1-800-308-5561
 
The Executive Director or a delegate will review the customer feedback, investigate the situation, attempt to resolve it and provide a response within 14 business days of receiving the information.
 
Note: Complaints will be addressed according to other OHRC complaint procedures.
 

8. Modifications to this or other policies:

We are committed to developing customer service policies that respect and promote the dignity and independence of people with disabilities. Therefore, no changes will be made to this policy before considering the impact on people with disabilities. 
 

OHRC multi-year AODA accessibility plan 2020–21 – 2025–26

Introduction

This document outlines the Ontario Human Rights Commission’s (OHRC) multi-year AODA accessibility plan (accessibility plan) for 2020–21 – 2025–26 to:

  1. Prevent and remove barriers for persons with disabilities
  2. Meet the requirements set out in the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005 and its regulations.

Statement of commitment

The OHRC supports the full inclusion of persons with disabilities as set out in the United Nations’ Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Ontario Human Rights Code (Code), the OHRC’s Policy on ableism and discrimination based on disability, and the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005 (AODA). The Code has primacy over the AODA. The OHRC is committed to complying with the accessibility standards set out in the AODA’s Integrated Accessibility Standards Regulation (IASR) and the duty to accommodate disability related needs under the Code.

AODA requirements

Ontario Regulation 191/11: Integrated Accessibility Standards (IASR) under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005 (AODA) include accessibility standards for:

  • Policies, training, plans and reports
  • Procurement
  • Customer service
  • Information and communications
  • Employment
  • Transportation
  • The built environment.

Section 4 of the IASR requires the Government of Ontario and designated public sector organizations, including the OHRC, to create, maintain and make publicly available a multi-year accessibility plan. The accessibility plan must be created, reviewed and updated in consultation with persons with disabilities. The accessibility plan must also be reviewed at least once every five years, and all organizations are required to report annually on the progress they have made to implement the accessibility plan and comply with the IASR. The status reports must be made available to the public.

The Ontario Public Service’s 2017–21 OPS Multi-Year Accessibility Plan describes the OPS’ commitment to accessibility, and the steps the government is taking to prevent and remove barriers for persons with disabilities in employment, services and in making policy. The OPS accessibility plan outlines the government’s strategies to prevent, identify and remove barriers for persons with disabilities. The Ministry of the Attorney General’s Accessibility for People with Disabilities Plan sets out what the ministry plans to do to prevent and remove barriers for persons with disabilities, and what steps it is taking to comply with the requirements set out in the AODA and its regulations.

The OHRC has considered these requirements and plans in the development of its accessibility plan.

Guiding principles and policies

In accordance with section 3 of the IASR, and our mandate under section 29 of the Code, we have established and are also guided by our policies and other functions that promote, protect and advance understanding of human rights for people with disabilities.

For example, the OHRC has published various policies and reports including its Policy on ableism and discrimination based on disability, Minds that Matter: Report on the consultation on human rights, mental health and addictions, and its Policy on preventing discrimination based on mental health disabilities and addictions. The OHRC has also published eLearning modules on Ableism and discrimination based on disability, Human rights and the duty to accommodate and Working Together: The Code and the AODA.

Application

The OHRC accessibility plan applies to:

 

Strategies and actions for 2020–21 – 2025–26

The OHRC is committed to advancing the human rights of persons with disabilities using our mandate under the Code, through activities such as public education, policy development, public inquiries and litigation.

The OHRC makes the following commitments to meet the goal of being an organization that is fully accessible to persons with disabilities. The OHRC’s activities will help us comply with the Code, the AODA and the IASR in the following areas:

  • Customer service
  • Information and communications
  • Employment
  • Accessibility training
  • Procurement.

Customer service

In accordance with Part IV.2 of the IASR, the OHRC is committed to ensuring that all individuals have access to and can effectively use its services, goods and facilities. The OHRC has the following in place to meet its obligations and commitments:

  • Customer service policy on Providing goods and services to people with disabilities, as required by the IASR
  • Communications supports such as sign language interpretation and captioning for OHRC-hosted public events as required; other forms of accommodation are available upon request
  • All OHRC-hosted public events take place at accessible locations or on accessible video conferencing platforms. The OHRC takes steps to confirm that each physical and virtual event space is fully accessible before finalizing an event
  • Standard language on all invitations invites people to contact the OHRC about additional Code-related accommodation requests before event dates
  • As required under Section 11 of the IASR, a web-based feedback process is available to help the OHRC better understand how well customer expectations are being met. People can also provide feedback via telephone, TTY, mail or fax
  • The OHRC is committed to providing customer service in a way that best respects the dignity and independence of persons with disabilities. The OHRC will continue to adhere to its customer service policy on Providing goods and services to people with disabilities and the IASR by:
    • Ensuring that stakeholders, clients and employees are aware of their roles and responsibilities under this accessible customer service procedure
    • Promptly addressing accommodation and accessibility issues identified in a dignified and respectful way, to facilitate effective access to, and participation in, OHRC services
    • Responding to identified accommodation and accessibility needs on an individual basis.

In consultation with people with disabilities, the OHRC will review and make any necessary changes to improve the accessibility of its:

  • Customer service policy and practices in accordance with the standards under the IASR, including:
    • Routinely asking individuals if they require any disability-related accommodations or assistance
    • Reviewing potential barriers that visitors with disabilities may experience when arriving at the OHRC’s offices, including the accessibility of the current elevator lobby phone, staff phone list and lack of “glass door” reception for visitors with vision and/or hearing loss or other types of disabilities
    • Clarifying that the customer service policy applies to individuals who use mobility devices
    • Reviewing potential barriers that individuals who use mobility devices may experience within the OHRC’s offices, including along internal paths of travel to and within meeting rooms
    • Informing visitors that the OHRC has a quiet room available for persons with disabilities who may require private space to take medication or rest.
  • Mechanism/procedure for the OHRC to receive AODA compliance-related feedback or inquiries, including complaints, in accordance with section 11 of the IASR:
    • Including clarifying the process to provide feedback via website, phone and TTY.

Information and communications

In accordance with Part II of the IASR, the OHRC is committed to making sure its information and communications systems and products are accessible to persons with disabilities.

  • The OHRC takes into account individual disabilities when communicating with people. The OHRC will continue to review its digital and other communication methods in an effort to improve accessibility to its services.
  • The OHRC’s website is designed to comply with the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0, Level AA.
  • The OHRC has in place internal emergency procedures and plans, including personalized evacuation plans, with the Persons in Need of Assistance list continuously updated and confidentially shared with the property manager.
  • Staff will continue to receive appropriate specialized training on emerging procedures and plans, video conferencing platforms, designing accessible eLearning modules, and other topics to improve the accessibility of the OHRC’s online resources.
  • Staff routinely take steps to make the website and communication products as accessible as possible, including:
    • The tools and products that are used to develop the website and other online materials have built-in accessibility features
    • Web developers and any other external vendors are selected, in part, based on their experience designing accessible websites
    • Any online materials, such as eLearning modules, are tested regularly during their development and are tested on an ongoing basis by staff and by external persons with disabilities
    • Captioning and transcripts are provided for all video content
    • The OHRC provides local and toll free TTY numbers for communicating with people who are Deaf, deafened or hard of hearing
    • The OHRC uses a range of communication methods such as mail, email, telephone, video conferencing including Internet-based communications platforms, and social media platforms to communicate with stakeholders and members of the public
    • All public documents, including correspondence and publications, are available in accessible digital formats, such as HTML or accessible PDFs, and MS Word document format is available upon request
    • All staff are expected to use plain language to write publications, documents, training materials and correspondence. Assistance with plain language editing is available for all OHRC policies and publications.

In consultation with people with disabilities, the OHRC will review and make any necessary changes to improve the accessibility of its:

  • Website, as it works towards revamping the website design, including but not limited to the accessibility of posted documents inPDF format, and potentially MS Word format, as well as online eLearning modules/videos, including whether any elements of these online products may be causing barriers (e.g. watermarks on documents or music playing in the background of eLearning modules/video)
  • Social and other media accounts, including Facebook, Instagram, YouTube and especially Twitter
  • Other OHRC digital information and communications, including email, electronic document formats and distribution, and its audio/video teleconferencing software and practices, including making sure video conferencing participants who require them have access to and know how to use accessibility features such as captioning
  • Other information technology the OHRC uses including computer software (e.g. correspondence software, VPN access) and hardware (e.g. employee personal computers, telephones, audio-video conferencing equipment)
  • Plain language writing at Grade 10 and lower levels for people with reading-related disabilities
  • Emergency procedures, plans and public safety information including making sure staff know what to do when visitors with disabilities are on-site during an emergency
  • TTY phone line, including reviewing current use and best practices, or alternatives, for contacting the OHRC office that meet the preferred mode of communication for individuals who are Deaf, deafened or hard of hearing.

Employment

In accordance with Part III of the IASR, the OHRC is committed to ensuring that the recruitment process for new staff is accessible.

  • The OHRC is committed to accessible employment practices and policies to attract and retain employees with disabilities. The OHRC is also committed to providing accommodation to employees with disabilities in a way that best respects their dignity and allows them to carry out their essential job duties and take part fully and meaningfully in the OHRC’s work. The OHRC also believes that inclusive design and integration are preferable to individual accommodations, where possible.
  • The OHRC informs candidates and employees about their right to accommodation and will advise candidates about the type of testing that they will be expected to do during the interview process, so that candidates can request an appropriate accommodation for a disability if need be.
  • The OHRC follows the OPS Employee Accommodation and Return to Work Guidelines and Operating Policy for developing and documenting individual accommodation plans, return-to-work plans and workplace emergency response information for employees with disabilities.
  • New OHRC employees receive information and training on employees’ rights and responsibilities under the Code, the AODA and OPS policies that foster an inclusive workplace. These include the OHRC’s customer service policy on Providing goods and services to people with disabilities and commitment to promote a scent-sensitive office space.
  • The OHRC will continue to adhere to OPS policies and procedures on employment accommodation for both current and prospective employees with disabilities, as well as the standards outlined in the IASR.
  • The OHRC has an accessible quiet room for staff and visitors, which improves accessibility for persons with disabilities who may require private space to take medication or rest, for example. It improves accessibility for staff and visitors based on creed. It also improves accessibility for women who are breastfeeding.

In consultation with people with disabilities, the OHRC will review and make any necessary changes to improve the accessibility of its employment policies and practices (e.g. employee recruitment, accommodation procedures and plans) in accordance with Part II of the IASR as well as Ontario Public Service policies including making sure time limits for recruitment tests are designed inclusively and do not generally adversely affect candidates with disabilities, and accommodations are available to meet the disability-related need for more time.

Accessibility training

In accordance with sections 3 and 80.49 of the IASR, the OHRC is committed to making sure that all staff and commissioners remain informed about their rights and responsibilities under the Code, the AODA and the IASR by providing ongoing training.

  • All OHRC staff and commissioners receive ongoing training on disability-related policies and procedures, including AODA mandatory training on the requirements of the accessibility standards under the IASR, and on the Code as it pertains to persons with disabilities. All current staff have completed the OHRC’s eLearning module Working Together: The Code and the AODA.
  • The OHRC has an internal guide on plain-language writing and staff have been trained on plain-language writing. In addition to providing ongoing training to staff, as part of its mandate, the OHRC will continue to offer training on disability and the duty to accommodate to the public.
  • In accordance with the OPS requirements, the OHRC will track staff and commissioner training on accessibility and the duty to accommodate for disability and other grounds of the Code.

In consultation with people with disabilities, the OHRC will review and make any necessary changes to improve its staff and Commissioner training on IASR requirements, including making sure:

  • New staff receive information and training on the OHRC and OPS inclusive workplace policies
  • Current staff receive refresher training on the AODA, including the accessible customer service requirements
  • Relevant staff receive regular training on evolving best practice standards for accessible website design and online resources
  • All staff receive refresher training on plain-language writing at Grade 10 and lower levels.

Procurement

In accordance with section 5 of the IASR, the OHRC is committed to incorporating accessibility design, criteria and features when procuring or acquiring goods, services or facilities.

  • The OHRC will continue to comply with the procurement standard in the IASR and the accessibility obligations in the Ontario Public Service Procurement Directive Issued by Management Board of Cabinet in December 2014.
  • The OHRC will identify accessibility requirements in project terms of reference, requests for proposals and contracts with third-party service providers.
  • Where necessary, staff with disabilities will be consulted about any accessibility considerations at the outset of the procurement, so that they are included in the contract.

In consultation with people with disabilities, the OHRC will review and make any necessary changes to improve the accessibility of its procurement practices.

 

OHRC achievements from its 2014–19 multi-year AODA accessibility plan

The OHRC implemented the following initiatives as part of its 2014–19 Multi-year AODA accessibility plan:

  • Reviewed its customer service policy on Providing goods and services to people with disabilities
  • Designated an accessible quiet room for staff and visitors
  • Amended staff email signatures to include information about alternative forms of accommodation on request
  • Installed an accessible public telephone in the OHRC 9th floor elevator lobby
  • Developed and launched a Policy on ableism and discrimination based on disability
  • Reconfigured lighting in its boardrooms to improve accessibility
  • Updated the OHRC’s internal guide on plain language writing and provided training to all staff
  • Prepared accessibility guidelines and a checklist for the Association of Statutory Human Rights Agencies (CASHRA) to ensure commission documents, communications, meetings and events, including conferences and training sessions, are accessible for people with disabilities and other human rights-related needs
  • Developed public eLearning modules on duty to accommodate disability including Working together: the AODA and the Code
  • Trained staff and commissioners on human rights, accessibility and the duty to accommodate employees and clients with disabilities, including training on the AODA and the Code
  • Routinely sought feedback at the end of education and training sessions to understand how well Code-related accommodation needs of participants were met.

 

Feedback process

In accordance with section 11 of the IASR, the OHRC encourages feedback about its accessibility, including customer service, its website, employment practices, procurement, etc. Feedback can be submitted using an online request form, available at: www.ohrc.on.ca/en/contact/ohrc-feedback. Feedback can also be made in writing, by telephone, TTY or email to:

Ontario Human Rights Commission
Executive Director’s Office
180 Dundas Street West, Suite 900
Toronto, ON M7A 2R9 

Tel: 416-314-4562
Toll Free: 1-800-387-9080
Fax: 416-325-2004
TTY Local: 416-326-0603
TTY Toll Free: 1-800-308-5561
Email: info@ohrc.on.ca

The Executive Director or a delegate will review the customer feedback, investigate the situation, try to resolve it and provide a response within 14 business days of receiving the information.

 

Conclusion

The OHRC will report publicly through our annual report about our progress on implementing this accessibility plan, our commitments to identify and remove barriers for persons with disabilities, and the steps we have taken to comply with the requirements of the IASR.

Code Grounds: 
Organizational responsibility: 

Memorandum of understanding between the Attorney General of Ontario and the Ontario Human Rights Commission

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
between The Attorney General of Ontario and
The Chief Commissioner, Ontario Human Rights Commission,
on behalf of the Commission

Preamble

The Minister and the Chief Commissioner share a commitment to the principles captured in the preamble to Ontario's Human Rights Code, which recognizes the importance of and the need to reflect relevant international human rights principles, and agree that a strong and independent Ontario Human Rights Commission, capable of fulfilling its mandate efficiently and effectively, contributes substantially to the realization of those principles. (Appendix I sets out, for convenience, the relevant portions of the preamble to the Code.) To that end, the Minister and Chief Commissioner share the goal of establishing a relationship that ensures the responsible administration of the Commission and the fulfillment of its legislative mandate in a manner consistent with the effective and efficient use of public resources and with the Commission's independent role in facilitating compliance with the Code.

The Minister and the Chief Commissioner are also committed to ensuring the flow of appropriate information between the Ministry and the Commission to assist each in fulfilling its proper role in respect of the Code.

1.0. Definitions 

In this Memorandum of Understanding:

“AAD” means the Agencies and Appointments Directive

"Chief Commissioner" means the Chief Commissioner of the Ontario Human Rights Commission appointed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council pursuant to section 27 of the Code and includes any Acting Chief Commissioner appointed temporarily under section 28 of the Code;

"Code" means the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended from time to time;

"Commission" means the statutory body known as the Ontario Human Rights Commission and comprising the appointed members of the Commission and the public servants appointed under the Public Service of Ontario Act to carry out the Commission's administrative and operational powers and obligations;

"Commissioners" means the members appointed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council to the Commission pursuant to section 27 of the Code;

"Deputy Minister" means the deputy minister of the Ministry;

  "Executive Director" means the Executive Director of the Commission;

"FIPPA" means the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. F.31, as amended from time to time;

“HRLSC” means the Human Rights Legal Support Centre;

"MBC" means Management Board of Cabinet;

"MOU" means Memorandum of Understanding;

"Minister" means the Attorney General of Ontario, or such other minister to whom the Lieutenant Governor in Council may subsequently assign ministerial responsibility for the Code;

"Ministry" means the ministry led from time to time by the Minister;

"PSOA" means the Public Service of Ontario Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 35, Schedule A, as it may be amended from time to time;

"TB" means the Treasury Board of Ontario; and

"Tribunal" means the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

2. Purpose

The purpose of this MOU is to:

  1. Clarify the financial, administrative, human resources and reporting relationships between the Minister and the Commission through its Chief Commissioner;
  2. Clarify the roles and responsibilities of the Minister, the Chief Commissioner, the Deputy Minister, the Executive Director and the Commission; and
  3. Set out the expectations for the administrative, financial, auditing, human resources and reporting arrangements between the Commission and the Ministry.

3.  Commission's legal authority and mandate 

  1. The Commission’s legal authority derives from the Code.
  2. The Corporations Act and the Corporations Information Act do not apply to the Commission.
  3. The Commission does not have independent legal personality and cannot sue, be sued or hold property in its own right.
  4. The Commission’s mandate is to protect, promote and advance human rights in Ontario. Its functions are those set out in section 29 of the Code, as it may be amended from time to time. Appendix I sets out, for convenience, the functions prescribed for the Commission in the Code at the time this MOU comes into effect.

4.  The Commission's classification

  1. The Commission is classified under the AAD as a regulatory agency without a governing board.
  2. Sections 1 and 2 of Ontario Regulation 374/07 designate the Commission as a public body and a Commission public body for purposes of the PSOA.
  3. The Commission is an agent of the Crown in right of Ontario within the meaning of the Crown Agency Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.48, as amended.

5.  Guiding principles

The parties acknowledge and agree to the following principles.

  1. The human rights system in Ontario comprises the Commission, the Tribunal and the Human Rights Legal Support Centre.
  2. The principles set out in the preamble to the Code (and reproduced for convenience in Appendix I) are at the foundation of Ontario’s human rights system.
  3. The Commission exercises powers and performs duties in accordance with its legal mandate. The Commission plays a meaningful role in the development, as well as the delivery, of the policies and programs of the government.
  4. The Commission’s decisions relating to regulatory, litigation, public education and policy matters must be made and be seen to made impartially and independently of the government. Government interference with the choice or conduct of any Commission inquiries, with the formulation or publication of any Commission policies, with Commission determinations under section 14 of the Code or with the Commission’s decisions about involvement in or initiation of any Tribunal or other legal proceedings would compromise the Commission’s capacity to function independently and impartially, and would be inappropriate.
  5. In carrying out its statutory mandate, the Commission may take positions that are publicly critical of, or that challenge, legislation and current government policies, positions and/or practices.
  6. The Attorney General is the guardian of the public interest in respect of the rule of law and the administration of justice.  He or she has statutory obligations to ensure that the administration of public affairs is in accordance with law and to superintend all matters connected with the administration of justice in Ontario.
  7. The Attorney General and the Chief Commissioner shall engage in meaningful, good faith consultation about matters that either may reasonably consider to be of importance to both.
  8. Accountability is a fundamental principle to be observed in the management and administration of the Commission.
  9. The Commission is to conduct itself in accordance with the management principles of the government of Ontario. These include: ethical behaviour; prudent, efficient and lawful use of public resources; fairness; high quality service to the public; and openness and transparency to the extent allowed under law.
  10. The Commission shall conduct its business and administrative affairs in accordance with all relevant government policies and with generally accepted management and accounting principles.
  11. The Ministry and the Commission shall avoid duplication of services wherever possible.

6.  Interpretation

This MOU is to be construed and applied in a manner consistent with its guiding principles, with the Code and any relevant regulations and international human rights principles that guide development and protection of effective national institutions for the protection and promotion of human rights and of ensuring the pluralism of their membership and their independence.  It does not modify, limit or interfere with the responsibilities of any of its parties as established by law.  In case of conflict between this MOU and any statute (including the Code) or regulation, the statute or regulation prevails to the extent of the conflict.  Section 47(2) of the Code gives the Code presumptive primacy over other legislation in case of conflict

7.  Duration, review and amendment

  1. This MOU takes effect on the date it is signed by both parties.  In accordance with AAD requirements, the Chief Commissioner’s signature shall precede the Minister’s. It expires five years from the date it comes into effect unless replaced by a new MOU before that date, but shall remain in force on a strictly temporary basis until a new MOU replaces it.
  2. Either the Minister or the Chief Commissioner may initiate a review of this MOU at any time by written request to the other.
  3. In any event, the Minister and the Chief Commissioner shall initiate and cooperate in a full review of this MOU on the earlier of the following dates:
    1. Within thirty days of the date any significant change to the Commission’s statutory mandate, authority or governance structure, other than those already scheduled to come into force by January 1, 2009, takes effect;
    2. The date the Lieutenant Governor in Council assigns ministerial responsibility for the Code to the minister of a different ministry, unless that Minister and Chief Commissioner agree by letter that this MOU will continue in force without review or amendment; or
    3. Four years from the date this MOU takes effect.
  4. The Minister and the Chief Commissioner may, at any time, by mutual agreement after a review of this MOU, revise or amend it without affecting its ordinary termination date, or replace it with a new MOU.

8. Periodic review

  1. The Code requires the Minister to appoint a person to conduct a review of “the implementation and effectiveness of the changes resulting from the enactment” of the 2006 amendments to the Code three years after the effective date of those amendments. That person’s review may consider any aspect of the human rights system affected by the amendments, including the Commission’s mandate, powers, governance structure and/or operations.
  2. In addition, the Minister or TB/MBC may direct periodic reviews of the Commission; Treasury Board/Management Board Directives require such a review of each classified agency every five years.  The Minister and the Chief Commissioner shall consult with one another as appropriate during any such review. 
  3. The Chief Commissioner and the Executive Director shall cooperate in any such review.

9.  Accountability relationships

9.1 Minister
  1. The Minister is responsible to the Legislative Assembly for the Code.  The Minister is accountable to the Cabinet for reporting on whether the Commission is conducting itself in a manner consistent with its legal authority and with relevant and appropriate government policies.
  2. The Minister is answerable for inquiries about the Commission in the Cabinet and its committees and in the Legislative Assembly.
9.2  Chief Commissioner
  1. The Chief Commissioner shall ensure
    1. That the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly receives the Commission’s annual report for one fiscal year not later than June 30 of the next fiscal year; and
    2. That the Minister receives a copy of the annual report at least thirty (30) days before the Speaker receives it and shall appear, where invited or permitted, and respond to inquiries about the affairs of the Commission before committees of the Legislative Assembly.
  2. The Chief Commissioner is accountable to the Minister for the Commission’s financial and administrative performance, for carrying out the roles assigned to the Chief Commissioner under this MOU, TB/MBC and Ministry of Finance directives and the Commission’s approved annual business plan, and for ensuring that the Commission’s performance reflects and respects the law and its statutory mandate.
9.3 The Commission
  1. The Commission is accountable to the people of Ontario in reports on its own affairs and on the state of human rights in Ontario.
  2. The Commission is accountable annually to the Legislative Assembly for the affairs it undertakes and the manner in which it carries them out.
  3. The Commission acknowledges that it is accountable in financial and administrative matters for compliance with this MOU, with TB/MBC and Ministry of Finance directives, and with its approved business plan, and generally for ensuring that its performance reflects and respects the law and fulfills its statutory mandate, and that this means accountability to the Legislative Assembly through its annual reports and, through its reports on financial and administrative matters, to the Minister.
9.4  Deputy Minister

The Deputy Minister is accountable to the Minister for the performance of the Ministry in providing administrative support to the Commission in fulfilling its mandate and for carrying out the roles and responsibilities assigned to him or her by the Minister, by TB/MBC and Ministry of Finance directives and by this MOU.

9.5  Executive Director
  1. The Executive Director is accountable to the Commission through the Chief Commissioner on the functions of the Commission and to the Deputy Attorney General on financial and administrative matters.
  2. The Executive Director works under the direction of the Chief Commissioner to implement policies and operational decisions, and reports to the Chief Commissioner on the performance of Commission staff every ninety days, at a minimum.
9.6  Commission Staff

Commission staff report and are accountable to the Executive Director for their performance.

10. Conflict of interest

The Chief Commissioner is responsible for ensuring that appointees and staff of the Commission are informed of the conflict of interest rules, including the rules on political activity, that govern the Commission.

11. Roles and responsibilities

11.1 Minister

The Minister is responsible for:

  1. Monitoring, through the Chief Commissioner, the Commission's activities in relation to its mandate;
  2. Responding to inquiries about the Commission in Cabinet and its committees and in the Legislative Assembly;
  3. Reporting and responding to the Cabinet on the Commission's performance and compliance with government policies and policy directions;
  4. Receiving and reviewing an advance copy of the Commission's annual report before the Commission submits it to the Legislative Assembly;
  5. Meeting with the Chief Commissioner, as needed, to be kept informed of the Commission's affairs, including such matters as budget, objectives, plans, results and overall policy and public education activities;
  6. Meeting with the Commissioners at least once a year;
  7. Determining the need for any review and recommendations to TB/MBC on the status of the  Commission, its mandate or on any changes to the arrangements needed to assist it in fulfilling its existing statutory mandate;
  8. Recommending to TB/MBC, after consultation with the Chief Commissioner, the powers to be given to the Commission when a change in the Commission's mandate is being proposed;
  9. Meeting with the Chief Commissioner or the Commissioners to discuss, propose or recommend corrective action if, in his or her opinion, serious questions of public importance arise in respect of the Commission's operations;
  10. Ensuring, through the Deputy Minister, that the Commission operates in an efficient and effective manner in accordance with TB/MBC directives and guidelines;
  11. Informing the Chief Commissioner of any preferences the government may have in respect of the Commission or its mandate;
  12. Advising the Commission through the Chief Commissioner, as appropriate, of Ontario government public education or communications initiatives that relate to the Commission's responsibilities;
  13. Consulting as early as practicable, with the Chief Commissioner (and others) when the government is considering regulatory or legislative changes affecting Ontario's Human Rights Code, and as appropriate on significant and relevant new government directions;
  14. Monitoring for compliance with the Code in the development of government policy;
  15. Developing MOUs for the Commission with the Chief Commissioner and signing them into effect;
  16. Recommending to TB/MBC any provincial funding to be given to the Commission;
  17. Directing periodic review of the Commission in accordance with Part 8 of this MOU and making subsequent recommendations to TB/MBC;
  18. Recommending this MOU to TB/MBC for approval once there is agreement on text but before it is signed by the parties; and
  19. Reviewing and considering the advice of the Chief Commissioner on candidates for appointment or reappointment to the Commission.
11.2 Chief Commissioner

The Chief Commissioner is responsible for:

  1. Keeping informed of human rights issues and trends, domestic and, as appropriate, international, and of the activities, performance and expenditures of the Commission in order to advise and make recommendations to the Minister;
  2. Submitting the Commission's annual report to the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly in accordance with section 31.6(2) of the Code and, in accordance with section 31.6(3) of the Code, to the Minister at least thirty (30) days before submitting it to the Speaker;
  3. Keeping the Minister informed about the affairs of the Commission and about issues or events that may concern him or her in the exercise of his or her responsibilities;
  4. Providing the Minister with such information about the Commission's administrative  management as the Minister may require for reports to Cabinet, the Legislative Assembly and its committees and for the development and review of government policy, programs and administration;
  5. Meeting with the Minister to discuss possible corrective action if the Commission forms the opinion that serious questions of public importance have arisen about the government's compliance with the Code;
  6. Attending  and/or making  presentations, when  invited or  permitted, before committees      of   the    Legislative   Assembly   on   matters   affecting   the Commission's operations;
  7. ensuring that the Commission carries out its affairs in accordance with the Code;
  8. providing leadership to the Commission;
  9. presiding at meetings of the Commissioners;
  10. developing performance measures and targets for the Commission;
  11. monitoring the performance of the Commission to ensure the implementation of the Commission's goals and long-term vision;
  12. directing  corrective  action,  as  needed,  in  respect  of  the  Commission's operations and execution of its functions;
  13. reviewing  and  approving  the  Commission's  business  plan  and  budget proposals and its annual report and financial reports and submitting them to the Minister by the times and dates specified in TB/MBC and Ministry of Finance directives and in this MOU
  14. ensuring that public funds are used with integrity and honesty;
  15. providing both the Minister and the Minister of Finance with copies of every audit report and with the Commission's response to each such report and to any recommendations contained within it in a timely manner;
  16. advising the Minister annually on any outstanding audit recommendations;
  17. ensuring that Commissioners are informed of their responsibilities under the PSOA  in respect of ethical conduct (PSOA,  Part Ill)  and political activity (PSOA, Part IV);
  18. recording  any declared  or  apparent  conflicts of  interest and  advising the Minister and the Conflict of Interest Commissioner of these conflicts promptly
  19. hiring the Executive Director, in consultation with the Deputy Minister ;
  20. ensuring through the Executive Director that:
    1. appropriate management systems (financial, information technology, human resources) are in place for the Commission's effective administration;
    2. the  Commission fulfills its  mandate  and  operates within its approved budget allocation;
    3. performance measures and targets are developed for the Commission;
    4. there is an      appropriate     framework     for     orienting    and      training Commissioners and staff;
    5. Commissioners  and staff are  aware of and comply with TB/MBC and Ministry of Finance Directives;
    6. the Commission has a process for responding, in a timely manner, to media  inquiries  and  resolving  promptly  complaints  or  other  concerns raised by the public that relate to the Commission's operations;
    7. Conflict of interest rules, approved by the Conflict of Interest Commissioner, are in place for Commission staff; and
    8. Commission policies are publicly available;
  21. carrying out effective public communications as the Commission's chief spokesperson;
  22. cooperating with any periodic review undertaken in accordance with Section 8 of this MOU;
  23. keeping the Minister informed of pending appointment vacancies and offering recommendations for appointments and reappointments;
  24. reviewing and approving Commissioners' claims for per diems and expenses;
  25. ensuring that the Executive Director's performance contract is in place and that it sets out the Executive Director's responsibilities and reporting obligations and the standards he or she is to meet in carrying them out;
  26. in consultation with the Deputy Minister,
    1. developing performance criteria for evaluation of the Executive Director; and
    2. evaluating the Executive Director's performance against those criteria;
  27. communicating Commission policy and strategic directions to the Executive Director;
  28. monitoring the Commission’s performance to ensure ethical behaviour, accountability and excellence in management, sound use of public resources, value for money, openness and transparency;
  29. working with the Minister to minimize duplication of services; and
  30. advising the Minister promptly of, and attempting to consult with him or her in advance about, any Commission plans or initiatives that may affect materially government policy, unless such advice or consultation would compromise the Commission’s mandate, independence or ability to function.
11.3 The Commissioners

The Commissioners are responsible for:

  1. ensuring that the Commission fulfills the functions assigned to it by section 29 of the Code;
  2. fulfilling their responsibilities under the PSOA in respect of ethical conduct (PSOA, Part III) and political activity (PSOA, Part IV); and
  3. consulting, as appropriate, with interested and affected parties on the Commission’s goals, objectives, strategic directions, rules and procedures.

Individual Commissioners are also responsible for carrying out such responsibilities of the Chief Commissioner as he or she may delegate to them under section 27(12) of the Code, subject to such conditions as the Chief Commissioner may prescribe.

11.4 Deputy Minister

The Deputy Minister is responsible for:

  1. the operation of the Ministry, including human resources policies, and the implementation of corporate policies, including policies concerning freedom of information and equal opportunity;
  2. providing, in consultation with the Executive Director, a framework for ascertaining whether the Commission is fulfilling its mandate, and assisting the Minister in conducting that appraisal;
  3. advising the Minister on the requirements of the AEAD and other directives that apply to the Commission;
  4. advising the Minister on the Commission’s operation and on any proposals that could affect its status;
  5. establishing a framework for reviewing and assessing the Commission’s business plans and other reports;
  6. advising the Minister on documents the Commission submits to the Minister for review or approval, or both;
  7. undertaking and cooperating with any review of the Commission as directed by the Minister or TB/MBC in accordance with Part 8 of this MOU;
  8. monitoring the Commission as requested by the Minister while respecting the Commission’s independence and authority; identifying, where warranted, occasions for corrective action and recommending to the Minister ways of resolving issues;
  9. negotiating a draft MOU with the Chief Commissioner as directed by the Minister;
  10. consulting with the Chief Commissioner, as needed, on matters of mutual importance, including: the Code; TB/MBC directives; Ministry policies; and services the Ministry provides;
  11. meeting with the Chief Commissioner as needed or as the Minister directs;
  12. arranging for the administrative, financial and other support for the Commission that this MOU prescribes;
  13. meeting regularly with the Executive Director to discuss matters of mutual importance to the Commission and the Ministry;
  14. receiving information from, and sharing information with, the Executive Director on emerging issues and events that concern or could reasonably be expected to concern the Commission, the Minister or the Deputy Minister in the exercise of their responsibilities; and
  15. consulting with the Chief Commissioner on the performance evaluation of the Executive Director and, pursuant to paragraph 11.2.s, about recruitment and selection of an Executive Director.
11.5 Executive Director

In addition to being the ethics executive for the Commission for purposes of the PSOA, the Executive Director is responsible for:

  1. establishing, in consultation with the Chief Commissioner, performance measures and targets for the Commission and a performance review system for Commission staff;
  2. arranging for audits, as needed;
  3. managing the Commission’s day-to-day operations in accordance with the Code, TB/MBC, Public Service Commission and Ministry of Finance directives, accepted business and financial practices, and this MOU;
  4. applying policies so that public funds are used with integrity and honesty;
  5. establishing and applying a financial management framework for the Commission;
  6. establishing systems to ensure that the Commission operates effectively within its approved business plan;
  7. ensuring that the Commission has an appropriate risk management framework and mitigating strategy, to help provide sufficient assurance that program or service delivery objectives are met;
  8. supporting the Chief Commissioner and the other Commissioners in meeting their responsibilities including  delivery  of orientation and training;
  9. carrying out in-year monitoring of the Commission’s operational performance and reporting on it to the Chief Commissioner;
  10. advising the Chief Commissioner and Commissioners on the Commission’s compliance with the Code, TB/MBC and Ministry of Finance directives and Ministry policies and procedures;
  11. seeking support and advice from the Ministry, as appropriate, on day-to-day management issues;
  12. consulting with the Deputy Minister, as needed, on matters of mutual importance, including services provided by the Ministry, TB/MBC and Ministry of Finance directives, and Ministry policies;
  13. cooperating with any periodic review undertaken in accordance with §8 of this MOU;
  14. establishing a system for the retention of formal Commission documents and for making such documents publicly available, as appropriate;
  15. receiving information from the Deputy Minister on emerging issues and events that concern, or could reasonably be expected to concern, the Chief Commissioner and the Executive Director in the exercise of their responsibilities;
  16. keeping the Chief Commissioner and the Deputy Minister advised about operational matters;
  17. preparing annual reports and business plans for the Commission as directed by the Chief Commissioner;
  18. ensuring that the Commission fulfills its mandate and operates within its approved budget allocation in doing so;
  19. preparing financial reports for the Commission;
  20. meeting performance objectives approved by the Chief Commissioner and the Deputy Minister;
  21. ensuring that Commission staff abide by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and by all applicable federal, provincial and municipal laws, orders, regulations and bylaws, including, but not limited to, the Code, the Financial Administration Act, FIPPA, the French Language Services Act, the Pay Equity Act, the PSOA and the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act;
  22. ensuring that the Commission has a process for responding, in a timely manner, to media inquiries and resolving promptly complaints or other concerns raised by the public that relate to the Commission’s operations; and
  23. ensuring that the Commission policies contemplated by section 30 of the Code are publicly available.

12.  Reporting requirements

12.1 Business Plan
  1. The Chief Commissioner shall ensure that the Minister is provided with the Commission’s annual business plans within the timelines the Minister establishes in accordance with the Ministry’s annual funding cycle.  
  2. The Chief Commissioner shall ensure that the Commission’s annual business plan fulfills the requirements of the AAD.
  3. Every business plan requires the Minister’s approval.  The Minister shall review the Commission’s annual business plan and shall advise the Chief Commissioner promptly whether he or she concurs with the directions the Commission proposes and of such concerns as he or she may have about it.
  4. The Chief Commissioner shall ensure that the Commission’s business plan includes a system of performance measures and reporting on the achievement of the objectives set out in the business plan.  That system shall specify performance indicators, targets and time lines, indicate how they will be achieved, and implement annual base line reporting and, where appropriate, quarterly monitoring.
  5. The Minister may be required to submit an approved annual Commission business plan for review.  If this happens, the Minister shall notify the Chief Commissioner of the requirement.
12.2 Annual Reports
  1. The Chief Commissioner is responsible for ensuring that the Commission’s annual reports fulfill the requirements of the Code.
  2. In accordance with section 31.6 of the Code, the Chief Commissioner shall ensure that the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly receives for tabling in the Legislative Assembly the Commission’s annual report for a given fiscal year not later than June 30 of the next fiscal year.
  3. The Chief Commissioner shall give a copy of the report to the Minister at least 30 days before it is submitted to the Speaker.
12.3  Other Reports and Documents
  1. The Chief Commissioner is responsible for ensuring that financial and administrative reports and documents required by TB/MBC directives are submitted to the Minister for review and approval according to the prescribed time lines.
  2. At the request of the Minister or Deputy Minister, the Chief Commissioner shall supply such specific financial and administrative data and other related information, not including identifying information about any individuals, as may be required from time to time for purposes of the Ministry’s administration.

13. Communications

The parties to this MOU recognize that the timely exchange of information on the operations and administration of the Commission is essential to the Minister in meeting his or her responsibilities to report and respond to the Legislative Assembly on the affairs of the Commission.  They recognize, as well, that it is essential that the Chief Commissioner be kept informed about government initiatives and broad policy directions that may affect the Commission’s mandate and functions.

The Minister and the Chief Commissioner therefore agree as follows.

  1. Nothing in this section of this MOU shall require any discussion or exchange of information between Commission personnel and the Minister, Deputy Minister or Ministry staff about specific current, past or future inquiries or determinations that lie within the Commission’s statutory authority.
  2. The Minister’s office shall redirect to the Commission without comment inquiries it receives about specific human rights matters in progress at the Commission.  Any response the Minister’s office makes to the inquiring party shall indicate that the inquiry has been forwarded to the Commission and that the Minister cannot interfere with a Commission proceeding.
  3. Except where doing so would compromise the Commission’s independence in the exercise of its statutory mandate or its ability to function quickly and effectively, the Chief Commissioner shall keep the Minister advised, in a timely manner, of all planned events and issues that concern or can reasonably be expected to concern the Minister in the exercise of the Minister’s responsibilities.
  4. The Minister shall consult with the Chief Commissioner, as appropriate, on government policy initiatives or legislation being considered by the government that may affect the Commission’s mandate or functions.
  5. The Minister and the Chief Commissioner shall consult with one another, as appropriate, on public communications strategies and publications relating to human rights in Ontario and shall keep one another informed, as appropriate, of the results of relevant consultations and discussions, focused and general, with the public.
  6. The Minister and the Chief Commissioner shall meet at least quarterly, or more frequently as requested, to discuss issues relating to the fulfillment of the Commission’s mandate.
  7. The Deputy Minister shall meet at least quarterly with the Executive Director and/or the Chief Commissioner to discuss issues relating to the efficient operation of the Commission and the provision by the Ministry of services to the Commission.
  8. The Commission’s annual business plan shall include a communications strategy.  Commission staff shall respond promptly to public and media inquiries, complaints and concerns about the Commission’s operations and activities.
  9. The Commission shall provide the Minister, as early as possible but, unless the Minister or the Deputy Minister consents to some shorter length of time, always at least three (3) days before public release, with advance copies, of any Commission-approved report or policy that the Commission proposes to make public.

14.  Administrative arrangements

 14.1 Government of Ontario Directives

The Chief Commissioner shall ensure that the Commission and its staff operate in accordance with the Code, TB/MBC and Ministry of Finance directives, Public Service Commission directives under the PSOA and Ministry financial and administrative policies and procedures.

14.2 Legal Services
  1. The Commission employs its own counsel but may, in rare cases, require private legal services. Where these services do not involve litigation or an inquiry connected to its mandate under the Code, including services involving contractual negotiations for IT services or a civil action claim for damages against a Commission member or employee, the Commission shall retain counsel in accordance with the Ministry of the Attorney General's Corporate Operating Policy on Acquiring and Using Legal Services and related guidelines. Where these services involve an inquiry under section 31 of the Code or litigation connected to the Commission's exercise of its mandate under the Code, such as cases in which the Commission has initiated an application or is an intervener in legal proceedings at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, the Commission shall retain counsel in accordance with the principles set out in the above noted Corporate Operating Policy and guidelines. For greater certainty, this means that the Commission will determine for itself whether to retain, and whom to retain as, private sector counsel but will do so only where circumstances indicate a conflict of interest, cost efficiency or a need for specialized expertise and only in accordance with the rates set out in the Private Sector Retention rates chart. The Commission agrees to retain, for audit purposes, a list of the instances in which it retains private sector legal services, the reasons for the retention, the nature of the work performed and cost. This list shall be produced to the Ministry upon request, in a way that would not interfere with the solicitor-client relationship or ongoing litigation.  It can also be reviewed by both parties at any time upon agreement and it shall be reviewed by both parties at the time that this MOU is subject to revision or renewal.
  2. Lawyers employed by the Commission are recognized as members of the Association of Law Officers of the Crown.
  3. Where the Commission is awarded legal costs in a Court or Tribunal proceeding it shall forward those costs to the Consolidated Revenue Fund in accordance with the Proceedings Against the Crown Act. Where the Commission is ordered to pay legal costs by a Court, or by a Tribunal and the Tribunal Order is filed with the Superior Court of Justice, the Commission shall notify the Director of the Crown Law Office, Civil, who will make arrangements for the amount to be paid from the Consolidated Revenue Fund in accordance with section 22 of the Proceedings Against the Crown Act.
  4. Where the Commission, the Chief Commissioner, a Commissioner or an employee of the Commission is named as a party in an action for damages, the Agency shall notify the Director of the Crown Law Office, Civil and a decision shall be made as soon as practicable as to whether or not that office shall deal with the matter.
14.3 Delegation of Human Resources Management Authority under the PSOA
  1. Sections 44 and 55(1)(c) of the PSOA authorize the Public Service Commission to delegate human resources authority in respect of Commission public bodies to the Deputy Minister and/or to an individual prescribed by regulation. Regulation 376/07 designates the Executive Director as the individual to whom such authority may be delegated in respect of Commission employees. In Appendix A1 of the document entitled Subdelegation of Powers, Duties and Functions Templates, attached for convenience as Appendix II of this MOU, the Public Service Commission has delegated some human resources authority in respect of Commission employees to the Executive Director and some to the Deputy Minister.
  2. The Executive Director and the Deputy Minister are responsible for exercising this authority in compliance with any relevant legislation, directives or policies, in accordance with the Commission’s mandate, and within the parameters of the delegated authority.
14.4 Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy
  1. Section 1 and the Schedule of Regulation 460, R.R.O. 1990, as amended, designate the Attorney General as the institution head of the Commission for purposes of FIPPA.  The Minister has delegated his authority as institution head to the Chief Commissioner.
  2. The Commission, as represented by the Chief Commissioner, warrants and agrees that any personal information, as defined under the FIPPA, that it collects shall be used and disclosed only in pursuit of the Commission’s objects and for no other purposes.  The Commission further warrants that it will have reasonable measures in place to ensure the security and confidentiality of all the personal information it holds.
14.5 Records Management
  1. The Executive Director is responsible for ensuring that:
    1. a system is in place for the creation, collection, maintenance and disposal of records; and
    2. the Commission complies with the TB/MBC Management of Recorded Information Directive and the Archives and Recordkeeping Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 34, Schedule A.
  2. The Commission has been designated under FIPPA and is required to meet the standards set out there for the creation, collection, maintenance and disposal of records.  The Executive Director shall ensure that the Commission has a system for meeting these standards in doing these tasks.
  3. The Commission shall keep and maintain, in a manner consistent with generally accepted accounting principles and clerical practices, all financial records, invoices and other financially relevant documents related to its activities or to funding provided by the Ministry.  The Commission shall manage such records and keep them available for the Ministry’s review for seven years from the date of the creation of the records.
  4. The Commission shall maintain and manage all non-financial documents and records relating to its activities or to funding received from the Ministry, including any records it receives or creates relating to report subjects, in a confidential manner pursuant to defined processes of retention and disposal consistent with the TB/MBC Directive on Management of Recorded Information, the Archives and Recordkeeping Act, and other applicable legislation.
  5. The Commission shall collect and use personal information, as defined in FIPPA, in accordance with Part III of FIPPA.
  6. The Commission shall permit the Ministry, upon reasonable notice, to inspect and copy any financial records, invoices and other financially-related documents, and any non-financial documents in the Commission’s possession and control that do not disclose identifying information about individuals, that relate to Commission funding or otherwise to the Commission’s administrative activities.
  7. If, after execution of this MOU, the Commission’s mandate in relation to information management expands, the Commission shall, at the Ministry’s request, submit to a Privacy Impact Assessment.
  8. The Commission shall ensure that every contract it enters on behalf of Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario for data collection and processing is specific about sources, entities and transfer from collection to destruction.
14.6 Client/Customer Service

The Commission has in place a formal process, consistent with the government’s service quality standards, for responding to complaints about the quality of the services it provides. Its annual Business Plan shall include performance measures and targets in respect of customer service and complaint response. This process is separate from any statutory provisions about review or reconsideration of any exercise of the Commission’s statutory powers.

15. Financial arrangements

15.1 Funding
  1. The Commission is funded from the Consolidated Revenue Fund pursuant to an appropriation authorized by the Legislative Assembly.
  2. The Chief Commissioner shall prepare and deliver to the Minister, in sufficient time for the Minister to analyze and approve them, annual estimates of the Commission’s expected expenditures for inclusion in the Ministry’s Results Based Plan. The Minister may, after appropriate consultation with the Chief Commissioner, alter these estimates as required.
  3. The Commission’s financial procedures shall accord with the Code, TB/MBC and Ministry of Finance directives and guidelines, and other applicable government direction.
  4. The Commission shall obtain the Minister’s approval and, pursuant to section 28 of the Financial Administration Act, the written approval of the Minister of Finance before entering into any financial arrangement or commitment, guarantee, indemnity or similar transaction that may increase, directly or indirectly, the indebtedness or contingent liability of the government or the Crown in right of Ontario.
  5. When the Minister of Finance orders it pursuant to section 16.4 of the Financial Administration Act, the Commission shall pay into the Consolidated Revenue Fund any money that the Minister of Finance determines to be surplus to its needs.
15.2  Financial Reports

The Chief Commissioner shall provide, on instruction from the Minister of Finance, the Commission’s financial information for consolidation into the Public Accounts. In addition, he or she shall provide annual financial statements to the Minister and shall include them as part of the Commission’s annual report. 

15.3  Goods and Service Tax (GST)

The Commission is not required to pay GST.

16.  Audits and review arrangements 

  1. The Ontario Internal Audit Division may carry out internal audits as authorized by the Ministry’s Audit Committee or the Corporate Audit Committee. Under the Auditor General Act, the Auditor General of Ontario may audit any aspect of the Commission’s operations at any time.
  2. The Chief Commissioner may request, at the Commission’s expense, an external audit of the Commission’s financial transactions or management controls.
  3. The Minister and the Chief Commissioner agree to share with one another the results of any audit of the Commission, regardless of which of them receives it first. The Commission shall give the Minister a copy of its response to the audit report and to any related recommendations and shall advise the Minister annually on any outstanding audit recommendations.

17.  Staffing 

  1. The Commission is staffed by persons employed under Part III of the PSOA.
  2. Permanent, full-time Commission employees participate in the Public Service Pension Plan.
  3. The Commission, in its dealings with staff employed under the PSOA, is subject to the Code, TB/MBC human resources directives, and Public Service Commission directives authorized by the PSOA.

18.  Liability protection and insurance

The government’s Protection Program covers the Commission.

Affirmed by:

Patricia DeGuire, Chief Commissioner

The Honourable Doug Downey,
Attorney General of Ontario

 

Appendix I
Relevant provisions of the Code

Preamble

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world and is in accord with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as proclaimed by the United Nations;

And Whereas it is public policy in Ontario to recognize the dignity and worth of every person and to provide for equal rights and opportunities without discrimination that is contrary to law, and having as its aim the creation of a climate of understanding and mutual respect for the dignity and worth of each person so that each person feels a part of the community and able to contribute fully to the development and well-being of the community and the Province;

And Whereas these principles have been confirmed in Ontario by a number of enactments of the Legislature and it is desirable to revise and extend the protection of human rights in Ontario;

Therefore, Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Ontario, enacts as follows:

 . . .

Part III: The Ontario Human Rights Commission

The Commission           

27. (1) The Ontario Human Rights Commission is continued under the name Ontario Human Rights Commission in English and Commission ontarienne des droits de la personne in French.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

Composition

 (2) The Commission shall be composed of such persons as are appointed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

Appointment

 (3)  Every person appointed to the Commission shall have knowledge, experience or training with respect to human rights law and issues.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

Criteria

 (4)  In the appointment of persons to the Commission under subsection (2), the importance of reflecting, in the composition of the Commission as a whole, the diversity of Ontario’s population shall be recognized.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

Chief Commissioner

 (5)  The Lieutenant Governor in Council shall designate a member of the Commission as Chief Commissioner.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

Powers and duties of Chief Commissioner

 (6)  The Chief Commissioner shall direct the Commission and exercise the powers and perform the duties assigned to the Chief Commissioner by or under this Act.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

Term of office

 (7)  The Chief Commissioner and other members of the Commission shall hold office for such term as may be specified by the Lieutenant Governor in Council.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

Remuneration

  (8)  The Chief Commissioner and other members of the Commission shall be paid such remuneration and allowance for expenses as are fixed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

Employees

 (9)  The Commission may appoint such employees as it considers necessary for the proper conduct of its affairs and the employees shall be appointed under the Public Service Act.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

Note: On the later of the day the Statutes of Ontario, 2006, chapter 35, Schedule C, section 132 comes into force and the day the Statutes of Ontario, 2006, chapter 30, section 4 comes into force, subsection (9) is amended by the Statutes of Ontario, 2006, chapter 35, Schedule C, subsection 132 (5) by striking out “the Public Service Act” at the end and substituting “Part III of the Public Service of Ontario Act, 2006”.  See: 2006, c. 35, Sched. C, ss. 132 (5), 137 (1).

Evidence obtained in performance of duties

 (10)  A member of the Commission shall not be required to give testimony in a civil suit or any proceeding as to information obtained in the performance of duties under this Act.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

Same, employees

(11)  An employee of the Commission shall not be required to give testimony in a civil suit or any proceeding other than a proceeding under this Act as to information obtained in the performance of duties under this Act.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

Delegation

 (12)  The Chief Commissioner may in writing delegate any of his or her powers, duties or functions under this Act to any member of the Anti-Racism Secretariat, the Disability Rights Secretariat or an advisory group or to any other member of the Commission, subject to such conditions as the Chief Commissioner may set out in the delegation.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

Divisions

 (13)  The Commission may authorize any function of the Commission to be performed by a division of the Commission composed of at least three members of the Commission.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

Acting Chief Commissioner

 28.  (1)  If the Chief Commissioner dies, resigns or is unable or neglects to perform his or her duties, the Lieutenant Governor in Council may appoint an Acting Chief Commissioner to hold office for such period as may be specified in the appointment.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

Same

 (2)  An Acting Chief Commissioner shall perform the duties and have the powers of the Chief Commissioner and shall be paid such remuneration and allowance for expenses as are fixed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

Functions of Commission

 29.  The functions of the Commission are to promote and advance respect for human rights in Ontario, to protect human rights in Ontario and, recognizing that it is in the public interest to do so and that it is the Commission’s duty to protect the public interest, to identify and promote the elimination of discriminatory practices and, more specifically,

  1. to forward the policy that the dignity and worth of every person be recognized and that equal rights and opportunities be provided without discrimination that is contrary to law;
  2. to develop and conduct programs of public information and education to,
    1. promote awareness and understanding of, respect for and compliance with this Act, and
    2. prevent and eliminate discriminatory practices that infringe rights under Part I;
  3. to undertake, direct and encourage research into discriminatory practices and to make recommendations designed to prevent and eliminate such discriminatory practices;
  4. to examine and review any statute or regulation, and any program or policy made by or under a statute, and make recommendations on any provision, program or policy that in its opinion is inconsistent with the intent of this Act;
  5. to initiate reviews and inquiries into incidents of tension or conflict, or conditions that lead or may lead to incidents of tension or conflict, in a community, institution, industry or sector of the economy, and to make recommendations, and encourage and co-ordinate plans, programs and activities, to reduce or prevent such incidents or sources of tension or conflict;
  6. to promote, assist and encourage public, municipal or private agencies, organizations, groups or persons to engage in programs to alleviate tensions and conflicts based upon identification by a prohibited ground of discrimination;
  7. to designate programs as special programs in accordance with section 14;
  8. to approve policies under section 30;
  9. to make applications to the Tribunal under section 35;
  10. to report to the people of Ontario on the state of human rights in Ontario and on its affairs;
  11. to perform the functions assigned to the Commission under this or any other Act.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

Commission policies

30.  The Commission may approve policies prepared and published by the Commission to provide guidance in the application of Parts I and II.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

. . .

Annual report

 31.6  (1)  Every year, the Commission shall prepare an annual report on the affairs of the Commission that occurred during the 12-month period ending on March 31 of each year.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

Report to Speaker

 (2)  The Commission shall submit the report to the Speaker of the Assembly no later than on June 30 in each year who shall cause the report to be laid before the Assembly if it is in session or, if not, at the next session.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

Copy to Minister

 (3)  The Commission shall give a copy of the report to the Minister at least 30 days before it is submitted to the Speaker under subsection (2).  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

Other reports

  31.7  In addition to the annual report, the Commission may make any other reports respecting the state of human rights in Ontario and the affairs of the Commission as it considers appropriate, and may present such reports to the public or any other person it considers appropriate.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

See: 2006, c. 30, ss. 4, 12 (2).

Appendix II

Subdelegation of powers, duties and functions templates

Public Services of Ontario Act, 2006
Public Service Commission
August, 2007
[excerpts]

. . .

 

APPENDIX A1

Public Service Commission
Delegation of powers, duties and functions
to
prescribed individuals and chairs and deputy ministers
in respect of public servants appointed to work in
Commission public bodies
Pursuant to subsections 44(4), (5), (9) and (10) and clause 55(1)(c) of the

Public Service of Ontario Act, 2006 (PSOA)

NOTE

PARAGRAPHS 1 AND 2, AND ONLY ONE OF PART A, B, C OR D, SHALL APPLY TO ANY
ONE COMMISSION PUBLIC BODY (THEREFORE, PARTS A, B, C AND D EACH BEGINS
WITH PARAGRAPH #3)

. . .

 

Delegation to deputy ministers and prescribed individuals in respect of public servants appointed to work in a Commission public body pursuant to PSOA subsections 44(4), (5), (9), (10)

  1. This instrument sets out the Delegation of Authority under the Public Service of Ontario Act, 2006, (the Act) made under subsection 44(4) of the Act by the Public Service Commission (PSC) to the persons described in Parts A, B, C and D of this document effective the date that the Act is proclaimed.
  2. All references to section numbers in this document refer to section numbers of the Act.

PART A: For use where delegations are to a PSC delegate who is a public servant in the Senior Management Group and to a deputy minister

Delegation to prescribed PSC delegate in the Senior Management Group

  1. Pursuant to clause 44(4)(a), the PSC delegates to the individual prescribed under clause 55(1)(c), if that person is in a position classified within the Senior Management Group, the PSC’s powers, duties and functions in respect of public servants appointed to work in the Commission public body for which that person was prescribed, as follows:

PSOA Powers, Duties and Functions

In Relation To

Subsections 32(2), (3)

and (4)

Appointing persons to employment by the Crown, for a fixed term or otherwise, to work in a Commission public body, as prescribed under clause 8 (1)(b) of the Public Service of Ontario Act, 2006, in classifications other than Senior Management Group 3 or 4, Information Technology Executive 3 or 4, Financial Management and Control Group 3 or Crown Counsel 5

 

Reappointing for one or more further terms persons appointed for a fixed term

Section 34

Imposing disciplinary measures for cause (including suspension but not dismissal)

Subsection 36(1)

Conducting an investigation to determine cause for the purposes of section 34

Subsection 36(2)

Pending the conclusion of an investigation, suspending the public servant for a period not exceeding the period prescribed under clause 55(1)(a)

Subsection 36(3)

Withholding the public servant’s salary, wages or any other remuneration, including benefits, during the suspension under  section 36; if he or she considers it appropriate to do so, and at  the end of the investigation, reimbursing amounts that were withheld if he or she considers it appropriate to do so

Subsection 37(1)

Where a public servant is appointed to employment for a term that is not fixed, directing that the public servant be on probation for a period of not more than one year

Subsection 41(1)

Receiving at least two weeks’ notice in writing from a public servant of his or her intention to resign from his or her position

Subsection 41(2)

Receiving from a public servant notice in writing of his or her withdrawal of the notice of intention to resign at any time before its effective date if no person has been appointed or selected for  appointment to the position held by the public servant; and Approving the withdrawal of the resignation

  1. Dismissal Delegation to Deputy Minister
  1. Pursuant to subsection 44(4), the PSC delegates to the deputy minister of the ministry whose minister is responsible for a Commission public body the power to dismiss a public servant under sections 34, 38 and 39 appointed to employment under subsection 32(2) to work in that Commission public body.
  2. Pursuant to subsection 44(10), a deputy minister shall obtain PSC permission to exercise his or her discretion in respect of subsection 38(1) for a regular employee who is employed in the Senior Management Group 2, 3 or 4, Information Technology Executive 2, 3 or 4, Financial Management and Control Group 2 or 3, Crown Counsel 5 or Ontario Provincial Police Commissioner 1 classifications.
  3. Pursuant to subsection 44(10), the deputy minister may not subdelegate the delegation in paragraph 4a) of this document with respect to subsection 38(1).
  1. Abandonment of Position Delegation to Deputy Minister

Pursuant to subsection 44(4), the PSC delegates to the deputy minister whose minister is responsible for a Commission public body the power under subsection 42(1) to declare in writing that a public servant appointed to employment under subsection 32(2) to work in that Commission public body has abandoned his or her position and that his or her employment by the Crown is terminated.

  1. Pursuant to subsection 44(9), the PSC imposes the following restriction on a deputy minister’s entitlement under subsection 44(6) to subdelegate to one or more public servants employed under section 32 who work in his or her ministry any of the powers, duties or functions delegated under subsection 44(4) in respect of public servants appointed to work in a Commission public body:
  • A deputy minister may only subdelegate the powers, duties and functions set out in paragraphs 4 and 5 to one or more public servants in positions in classifications within the Senior Management Group or Crown Counsel 5.

. . . 

Public complaint policy

 

Introduction

The Ontario Human Rights Commission (the “OHRC”) is committed to and works to provide the highest quality service to the people of Ontario. The OHRC developed its Public Complaints Policy and process (the “Policy”) to ensure that it responds to complaints from members of the public in a transparent, fair and timely manner.

As a non-board governed agency of the Ontario Public Service (OPS), the OHRC is subject to the OPS Service Directive and the OPS Common Service Standards.

The Memorandum of Understanding between the OHRC and the Attorney General requires the OHRC to have a formal process for responding to complaints about the quality of services it provides.

The OHRC’s mandate is to eliminate and prevent discrimination and to promote and advance human rights in Ontario. The OHRC primarily engages with partner and stakeholder organizations to achieve its mandate. The OHRC has limited direct interactions with members of the public. To the extent these interactions happen, they are to respond to requests for:

  • an inquiry or Commission-Initiated Application (CIA) under subsections 31 and 35 of the Ontario Human Rights Code (Code) respectively;
  • intervention in an application to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario under subsection 37 of the Code;
  • consultation, public education or speaking engagements;
  • access to records pursuant to the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act; and
  • accessible formats for various OHRC publications.

From time to time, the OHRC receives complaints about its service from members of the public. This Policy applies only to the types of complaints listed below. 

 

Types of complaints covered

This policy applies to complaints from members of the public and other entities about:

  • the conduct of any individuals employed by OHRC;
  • the conduct of OHRC Commissioners;
  • the quality of service received from the OHRC when accessing programs and services.

Complaints related to dissatisfaction with the OHRC’s decisions whether to conduct an inquiry or CIA, or their outcomes, are not covered under this policy.

 

How To File A Complaint

  1. Complaints about OHRC staff should be directly raised with the involved staff member. The staff member and, if required, their manager, will attempt to resolve the complaint.
  1. If the complaint is not resolved, the complainant may:
  • Fill out a complaint form (Appendix A) and send it by email to info@ohrc.on.ca. Specifics of the complaint should be included (i.e., what happened, where and when it occurred, the names of any witnesses and the resolution being sought).  
  • If the complainant needs help filling out the complaint form, they may call the OHRC at 416-326-9511.
  1. The OHRC will acknowledge the complaint by email within 2 business days of receiving the complaint. The OHRC may ask the complainant for more information.

 

Resolving A Complaint

  1. Addressing a complaint is the responsibility of the next-level manager removed from the complaint:
  • a complaint about a staff member will be addressed by their manager;
  • a complaint about a manager will be addressed by the Executive Director;
  • a complaint about a commissioner will be addressed by the Chief Commissioner;
  • a complaint about the Executive Director will be addressed by the Chief Commissioner.
  1. A complaint about the Chief Commissioner will be referred to the Ontario Ombudsman.
  1. Upon receipt of the complaint, the Communications and Issues Management branch will acknowledge the complaint and will forward the complaint to the Executive Advisor in the Executive Director’s Office who will assess the complaint.
  1. The Executive Advisor, in consultation with the Executive Director, will forward the complaint to the appropriate responsible manager for resolution.
  1. The complaint will be kept confidential within the provisions of the Freedom Information and Protection of Privacy Act.  However, in keeping with the principles of procedural fairness, the individual who is the subject of the complaint will be advised of the complaint and all relevant documents, including the complaint, will be shared with the individual.
  1. The responsible manager or delegate will address the complaint and attempt to resolve it within 21 business days from the date of the acknowledgement letter.
  1. The responsible manager or delegate may request the individual who is the subject of the complaint to provide a written response to the complaint. If the complaint cannot be resolved within 21 days, the complainant will be informed as soon as the matter has been reviewed.
  1. The responsible manager or delegate will send the complainant a written decision, including the reasons, within 21 business days of the acknowledgement letter, unless the complainant has been informed of a different timeline. If the complaint involves a staff member, a copy of the decision will be given to the staff member.
  1. If the complainant is not satisfied with the results of the resolution process, they may:
  1. File a request with the Chief Commissioner’s Office for review of decisions made by OHRC managers and Executive Director. The requests may be sent by email to cco@ohrc.on.ca; or
     
  2. Raise their concerns with the Ontario Ombudsman for decisions made by the Chief Commissioner.

 

Decision to not deal with a complaint

The OHRC will not deal with a complaint if the:

  • complainant does not identify themself or does not wish to provide their home and email addresses and telephone number;
  • complainant does not respond to a request for more information; or
  • matter has already been raised and addressed by the OHRC.

 

Alternative formats

This Policy is available in accessible formats upon request.  

 

 

AttachmentSize
PDF icon Public complaint form526.66 KB

Contact us

Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC)

The OHRC works to promote, protect and advance human rights through research, public education, targeted legal action and policy development.

We cannot provide information, advice or legal opinions on individual cases or circumstances. See the Human Rights Legal Support Centre for more information (below).

Ontario Human Rights Commission
180 Dundas Street West, 9th Floor
Toronto, ON M7A 2G5

Tel: (416) 326-9511
Toll Free: 1-800-387-9080
TTY (Local): (416) 326-0603
TTY (Toll Free) 1-800-308-5561
info@ohrc.on.ca

Telephone directory: INFO-GO

Media inquiries: (416) 314-4528

Public education services: Request form

Request an OHRC initiated-application, inquiry or intervention: info@ohrc.on.ca

Follow us: www.facebook.com/the.ohrc | twitter.com/OntHumanRights

Human Rights Legal Support Centre (HRLSC)

The HRLSC provides free legal assistance to people across Ontario who have experienced discrimination contrary to Ontario’s Human Rights Code, and who may want to file an application to the HRTO.

Human Rights Legal Support Centre
180 Dundas Street West, 8th Floor
Toronto, ON M7A 0A1

Tel: (416) 597-4900
Toll Free: 1-866—625-5179
TTY: (416) 597-4903
TTY Toll Free: 1-866 612-8627
www.hrlsc.on.ca

Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO)

The HRTO deals with all claims of discrimination filed under the Ontario Human Rights Code. The Tribunal resolves applications through mediation or adjudication.

Go to the Tribunal's website for:

Call the Tribunal for information about:

  • the Tribunal's processes for dealing with an application;
  • an application you have already filed at the Tribunal.

Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario
15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor
Toronto, ON M7A 2G6

Tel : (416) 326-1312
Toll Free: 1-866-598-0322
TTY (Call the Bell Relay Service): 1-800-855-0511
Fax: (416) 326-2199
Fax (Toll Free): 1-866-355-6099

Email: hrto.registrar@ontario.ca 
https://tribunalsontario.ca/hrto/contact/

 


Administrative: 

OHRC Community Engagement Strategy: 2019 Update

 

OHRC Community Engagement Strategy: 2019 Update

The Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC) approved a Community Engagement Strategy, Communities for change, in 2018 and also committed to reviewing it on an annual basis. This Update summarizes the results of the 2019 review.

A new environment

By adopting and adhering to its engagement strategy, the OHRC has deepened its relationships with a broad range of individuals and organizations, including NGOs, community groups, Indigenous peoples, the Human Rights Legal Support Centre (HRLSC) and other statutory human rights institutions. 

The OHRC remains committed to the core activities outlined in Communities for change. In this update, we identify the following opportunities and priorities for engagement, considering the limitations arising from new government directives:

  • Prioritize travel outside Toronto that is critical to Commissioner-approved initiatives
  • Prioritize travel related to OHRC’s membership in the Canadian Association of Statutory Human Rights Agencies (CASHRA)
  • Seek support from the requesting party for travel and accommodation costs associated with OHRC training or speaking, where appropriate
  • Explore third-party support for regionally diverse community members to attend the annual Community Advisory Group (CAG) Summit
  • Attend large gatherings of Indigenous leaders, such as Annual General Meetings, Chiefs’ Assemblies, etc.
  • Continue to leverage approved travel opportunities to engage in fact-finding tours and activities
  • Seek a municipal host and/or third-party sponsor for “Taking it Local” training
  • Deepen and expand our reach through traditional and social media.

Engagement with human rights duty holders

For 2019 – 2020, the OHRC will prioritize creating durable and reciprocal relationships with duty holders. The OHRC’s Strategic Plan 2017 – 2022 commits it to:

  • Provide practical guidance to facilitate duty holders’ compliance with human rights obligations in practice, with a particular focus on employers
  • Continue to provide education and outreach to help duty holders and others understand and act on their human rights and responsibilities.

Building on the OHRC’s ongoing collaboration with the Human Rights Professionals Association (HRPA) and based on the success of the CAG, the OHRC will explore creating a “Duty-holders Advisory Group” (DAG) pursuant to s. 31.5 of the Code. The DAG would provide for more robust communication between duty holders and the OHRC, and help identify and apply best practices, and createproducts that allow employers to meet their human rights obligations. 

Initiative-specific advisory groups

Consistent with its commitment to put people at the centre of its decisions, in 2019 the OHRC will bring together advisory steering committees comprised of Commissioners, CAG members, Elders/leaders, and people with lived experience in priority areas. These advisory steering committees will guide staff in implementing Commissioner-approved initiatives.